Cited by 42Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Genotyping of circulating cell-free DNA enables noninvasive tumor detection in myxoid liposarcomas

Braig, David, Becherer, Caroline, Bickert, Christiane, Braig, Moritz, Claus, Rainer, Eisenhardt, Anja E., Heinz, Juergen, Scholber, Jutta +7 more·2019·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors of mesenchymal origin. About 50% of patients with STS experience relapse and more than 30% will die within 10 years after diagnosis. In this study we investigated circulating free DNA (cfDNA) and tumor-specific genetic alterations therein (circulating tumor DNA, ctDNA) as diagnostic biomarkers. Plasma concentrations and fragmentation of cfDNA was analyzed with quantitative PCR. Patients with STS (n = 64) had significantly higher plasma concentrations and increased fragmentation of cfDNA when compared to patients in complete remission (n = 19) and healthy controls (n = 41) (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001). Due to overlapping values between patients with STS and controls, the sensitivity and specificity of these assays is limited. Sensitive assays to detect genomic alterations in cfDNA of synovial sarcomas (t(X;18)), myxoid liposarcomas (t(12;16) and TERT C228T promoter mutation) and well-differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcomas (MDM2 amplifications) were established. ctDNA was quantified in nine liposarcoma patients during the course of their treatment. Levels of breakpoint t(12;16) and TERT C228T ctDNA correlated with the clinical course and tumor burden in patients with myxoid liposarcomas (n = 4). ctDNA could detect minimal residual disease and tumor recurrence. In contrast, detection of MDM2 amplifications was not sensitive enough to detect tumors in patients with well-differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcomas (n = 5). Genotyping of cfDNA for tumor specific genetic alterations is a feasible and promising approach for monitoring tumor activity in patients with myxoid liposarcomas. Detection of ctDNA during follow-up examinations despite negative standard imaging studies might warrant more sensitive imaging (e.g. PET-CT) or closer follow-up intervals to timely localize and treat recurrences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.32216

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In synovial sarcoma and myxoid liposarcoma, subtype-matched structural-variant tracking supports aligning assay design with tumor biology.

    “In synovial sarcoma and myxoid liposarcoma, subtype-matched structural-variant tracking further supports the need to align assay design with tumor biology [ 14 , 15 , 24 ].”
  • Tumor-informed ctDNA monitoring in osteosarcoma and breakpoint-guided ctDNA monitoring in translocation-associated sarcomas currently have the clearest longitudinal clinical support.

    “Tumor-informed ctDNA monitoring in osteosarcoma and breakpoint-guided ctDNA monitoring in translocation-associated sarcomas currently have the clearest longitudinal clinical support, although both still require prospective multicenter validation before routine treatment decisions can be based on ctDNA alone [ 13 , 16 , 17 , 22 , 23 , 24 ].”
  • Synovial sarcoma and myxoid liposarcoma illustrate the value of structural-variant or breakpoint-informed approaches.

    “Synovial sarcoma and myxoid liposarcoma similarly illustrate the value of structural-variant or breakpoint-informed approaches, although available cohorts remain limited and assay standardization is still needed [ 14 , 15 , 24 , 35 ].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braig, D., Becherer, C., Bickert, C., Braig, M., Claus, R., Eisenhardt, A. E., Heinz, J., Scholber, J., Herget, G. W., Bronsert, P., Fricke, A., Follo, M., Stark, G. B., Bannasch, H., & Eisenhardt, S. U.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Braig, David
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-09
Volume
145
Issue
4
Pages
1148-1161
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2917570556
Cited by
42
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (396168587, EI 866/7‐1, CL 427/4‐1 and BR 5712/1‐1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
cell-free DNA, circulating tumor DNA, myxoid liposarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, non-invasive cancer detection, minimal residual disease, tumor recurrence monitoring, MDM2 amplification, synovial sarcoma, cfDNA fragmentation, diagnostic biomarkers
MeSH terms
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Cell-Free Nucleic Acids, Circulating Tumor DNA, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Mutation, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Case-Control Studies, Liposarcoma, Myxoid, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review