Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 526

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses

Open access
Volpe, Alessandro, Panzarella, Tony, Rendon, Ricardo A., Haider, Masoom A., Kondylis, Filippos I., Jewett, Michael A. S.·2004·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing, largely due to the widespread use of cross‐sectional imaging. Most renal tumors are detected incidentally as small, asymptomatic masses. To study their natural history, the authors prospectively followed a series of patients with this type of lesion who were unsuited for or refused surgery. METHODS: Twenty‐nine patients with 32 masses that measured < 4 cm in greatest dimension (25 solid masses and 7 complex cystic masses) were studied. The primary outcome was tumor size, which was calculated as volume over time. All patients were followed with serial abdominal imaging, and each mass had at least three follow‐up measurements. The median follow‐up was 27.9 months (range, 5.3–143.0 months). RESULTS: Overall, the average growth rate did not differ statistically from zero growth (P = 0.09; 95% confidence interval, − 0.005–0.2 cm per year) and was not associated with either initial size (P = 0.28) or mass type (P = 0.41). Seven masses (22%) reached 4 cm in greatest dimension after 12–85 months of follow‐up. Eight masses (25%) doubled their volumes within 12 months. Overall, 11 masses (34%) fulfilled 1 of these 2 criteria of rapid growth. Nine tumors were removed surgically after an average of 3.1 years of follow‐up because it was believed that they were growing fast. No patient had disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one‐third of small renal masses that are presumed RCCs grow if they are managed conservatively and are followed with serial imaging. The growth rate is slow or undetectable in the majority of patients. These observations raise the possibility of a period of initial observation in selected patients, particularly the elderly or infirm. Cancer 2004;100:738–45. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.20025

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 526

Metadata

Authors
Volpe, A., Panzarella, T., Rendon, R. A., Haider, M. A., Kondylis, F. I., & Jewett, M. A. S.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-03
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
738-745
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2071061528
Cited by
526
References
21
FWCI
17.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.20025
The paper
Volpe, A., Panzarella, T., Rendon, R. A., Haider, M. A., Kondylis, F. I., & Jewett, M. A. S. (2004). The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.