The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY FOR LOCALIZED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: IMPACT OF TUMOR SIZE ON PATIENT SURVIVAL, TUMOR RECURRENCE AND TNM STAGING
Abstract
PURPOSE: We studied the impact of tumor size on patient survival and tumor recurrence following nephron sparing surgery for localized sporadic renal cell carcinoma. In addition, we evaluated the usefulness of the new TNM staging system in which T1 versus T2 tumor status is delineated by tumor size 7 or less versus more than 7 cm., respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of nephron sparing surgery for localized sporadic renal cell carcinoma in 485 patients treated before 1997 were reviewed. Patients were divided into groups according to tumor size as 1--2.5 or less (142), 2--2.5 to 4.0 (168), 3--more than 4 to 7 (125) and 4--more than 7 cm (50). Mean postoperative followup was 47 months. RESULTS: Overall and cancer specific 5-year survival for the entire series was 81 and 92%, respectively. Of 44 patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma 16 (3.2%) had local recurrence and 28 (5.8%) had metastatic disease. There was no difference in 5-year cancer specific survival or tumor recurrence between groups 1 and 2 or groups 3 and 4. However, these outcome measures were significantly more favorable in groups 1 and 2 combined (tumors 4 cm. or less) compared to groups 3 and 4 combined (tumors more than 4 cm.) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Following nephron sparing surgery for localized sporadic renal cell carcinoma cancer-free survival is significantly better in patients with tumors 4 cm. or less compared to those with larger tumors. The usefulness of the current TNM staging system can be improved by subdividing T1 tumors into T1a (4 cm. or less) and T1b (4 to 7 cm.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
Rising Incidence of Renal Cell Cancer in the United States
Chow, W.-H. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.17.1628 · Cited by 1,586
Boring, C. C., Squires, T. S., Tong, T., & Montgomery, S. (1994) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.44.1.7 · Cited by 1,315
International Union Against Cancer (UICC)
Turner, B. (2012) · The Statesman’s Yearbook · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-59541-9_43 · Cited by 720
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors.5th ed
Szucs, R. (1998) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.207.1.66 · Cited by 448
Cited by
The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses
Volpe, A., Panzarella, T., Rendon, R. A., Haider, M. A., Kondylis, F. I., & Jewett, M. A. S. (2004) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.20025 · Cited by 526
Excise, Ablate or Observe: The Small Renal Mass Dilemma—A Meta-Analysis and Review
Kunkle, D. A., Egleston, B. L., & Uzzo, R. G. (2008) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.047 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- HAFEZ, K. S., FERGANY, A. F., & NOVICK, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1930-1933
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2046700945
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY FOR LOCALIZED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: IMPACT OF TUMOR SIZE ON PATIENT SURVIVAL, TUMOR RECURRENCE AND TNM STAGING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68071-8
- The paper
- HAFEZ, K. S., FERGANY, A. F., & NOVICK, A. C. (1999). NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY FOR LOCALIZED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: IMPACT OF TUMOR SIZE ON PATIENT SURVIVAL, TUMOR RECURRENCE AND TNM STAGING. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68071-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.