Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hormone receptor status and survival in a population‐based cohort of patients with breast carcinoma

Grann, Victor R., Troxel, Andrea B., Zojwalla, Naseem J., Jacobson, Judith S., Hershman, Dawn, Neugut, Alfred I.·2005·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess hormone receptor status as an independent predictor of survival in a population‐based cohort of women with breast carcinoma who were followed for up to 11 years. METHODS: Since 1990, the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program has collected data on hormone receptor status among patients with breast carcinoma. In a cohort of 205,736 women with breast carcinoma age ≥ 20 years at diagnosis who were entered into the SEER data base between 1990 and 2000, the authors analyzed the association of hormone receptor status with year of diagnosis, patient age, disease stage, tumor histology, tumor grade, race/ethnicity, and metropolitan/statewide residence areas. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were compared according to hormone receptor status, and Cox proportional‐hazards regression models were used to assess the association of hormone receptor status with breast carcinoma‐specific and all‐cause mortality controlling for age, disease stage, tumor grade, tumor histology, race/ethnicity, and SEER region. RESULTS: Women who had tumors that were positive for both estrogen and progesterone hormone receptors had significantly better survival than other women with breast carcinoma in the overall cohort, within each stage, and in the younger and older age groups, although the survival advantage was greater among women age ≤ 50 years than among older women. Hormone receptor status was associated with mortality even when patient age, disease stage, tumor grade, tumor histology, race/ethnicity, and metropolitan/statewide residence areas were taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: Hormone receptor status was identified as an independent predictor of outcome in women with breast carcinoma. Data from clinical trials with long follow‐up may shed light on whether and how the benefit of hormonal and other treatment varies with hormone receptor status. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.21030

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Grann, V. R., Troxel, A. B., Zojwalla, N. J., Jacobson, J. S., Hershman, D., & Neugut, A. I.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-20
Volume
103
Issue
11
Pages
2241-2251
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1974026856
Cited by
229
References
3
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hormone receptor status and survival in a population‐based cohort of patients with breast carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.21030
The paper
Grann, V. R., Troxel, A. B., Zojwalla, N. J., Jacobson, J. S., Hershman, D., & Neugut, A. I. (2005). Hormone receptor status and survival in a population‐based cohort of patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.