Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 820

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metastatic patterns in adenocarcinoma

Open access
Hess, Kenneth R., Varadhachary, Gauri R., Taylor, Sarah H., Wei, Wei, Raber, Martin N., Lenzi, Renato, Abbruzzese, James L.·2006·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unique metastatic patterns cited in the literature often arise from anecdotal clinical observations and autopsy reports. The authors analyzed clinical data from a large number of patients with histologically confirmed, distant‐stage adenocarcinoma to evaluate metastatic patterns. METHODS: Tumor registry data were collected between 1994‐1996 on 11 primary tumor sites and 15 metastatic sites from 4399 patients. The primary and metastatic sites were cross‐tabulated in various ways to identify patterns, and the authors developed algorithms by using multinomial logistic regression analysis to predict the locations of primary tumors based on metastatic patterns. RESULTS: Three primary tumors had single, dominant metastatic sites: ovary to abdominal cavity (91%), prostate to bone (90%), and pancreas to liver (85%). The liver was the dominant metastatic site for gastrointestinal (GI) primary tumors (71% of patients), whereas bone and lung metastases were noted most frequently in non‐GI primary tumors (43% and 29%, respectively). In a study of combinations of liver, abdominal cavity, and bone metastases, 86% of prostate primary tumors had only bone metastases, 80% of ovarian primary tumors had only abdominal cavity metastases, and 74% of pancreas primary tumors had only liver metastases. A single organ was the dominant source of metastases in 7 sites: axillary lymph node from the breast (97%), intestinal lymph node from the colon (84%), thoracic lymph node from the lung (66%), brain from the lung (64%), mediastinal lymph node from the lung (62%), supraclavicular lymph node from the breast (51%), and adrenal gland from the lung (51%). CONCLUSIONS: The algorithms that the authors developed achieved a cross‐validated accuracy of 64% and an accuracy of 64% on an 1851‐patient independent test set, compared with 9% accuracy when a random classifier was used. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.21778

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited

    Fidler, I. J. (2003) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1098 · Cited by 4,686 · cited 1×

    “Two prevailing hypotheses attempt to explain the metastatic patterns: the mechanical or hemodynamic hypothesis and the seed-and-soil hypothesis.(1,2) The mechanical hypothesis focuses on the anatomic delivery system: spread of the tumor first into the lymphatic system or body cavity followed by distant spread through…”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 820

Metadata

Authors
Hess, K. R., Varadhachary, G. R., Taylor, S. H., Wei, W., Raber, M. N., Lenzi, R., & Abbruzzese, J. L.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-16
Volume
106
Issue
7
Pages
1624-1633
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2047259303
Cited by
820
References
1
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metastatic patterns in adenocarcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.21778
The paper
Hess, K. R., Varadhachary, G. R., Taylor, S. H., Wei, W., Raber, M. N., Lenzi, R., & Abbruzzese, J. L. (2006). Metastatic patterns in adenocarcinoma. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21778

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.