Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How much can current interventions reduce colorectal cancer mortality in the U.S.?: Mortality projections for scenarios of risk‐factor modification, screening, and treatment

Open access
Vogelaar, Iris, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, Schrag, Deborah, Boer, Rob, Winawer, Sidney J., Habbema, J. Dik F., Zauber, Ann G.·2006·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the U.S., available interventions to reduce CRC mortality are disseminated only partially throughout the population. This study assessed the potential reduction in CRC mortality that may be achieved through further dissemination of current interventions for risk‐factor modification, screening, and treatment. METHODS.: The MISCAN‐COLON microsimulation model was used to simulate the 2000 U.S. population with respect to CRC risk‐factor prevalence, screening use, and treatment use. The model was used to project age‐standardized CRC mortality from 2000 to 2020 for 3 intervention scenarios. RESULTS.: Without changes in risk‐factor prevalence, screening use, and treatment use after 2000, CRC mortality would decrease by 17% by the Year 2020. If the 1995 to 2000 trends continue, then the projected reduction in mortality would be 36%. However, if trends in the prevalence of risk‐factors could be improved above continued trends, if screening use increased to 70% of the target population, and if the use of chemotherapy increased among all age groups, then a 49% reduction would be possible. Screening drove most (23%) of the projected mortality reduction with these optimistic trends; however, decreasing risk‐factors (16%) and increasing use of chemotherapy (10%) also contributed substantially. The contribution of risk‐factors may have been overestimated, because effect estimates could not be obtained from randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS.: Currently available interventions for risk‐factor modification, screening, and treatment have the potential to reduce CRC mortality by almost 50% by the Year 2020. However, without action now to further increase the uptake of current effective interventions, the reduction in CRC mortality may be only 17%. Cancer 2006. © American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.22115

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Vogelaar, I., van Ballegooijen, M., Schrag, D., Boer, R., Winawer, S. J., Habbema, J. D. F., & Zauber, A. G.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-18
Volume
107
Issue
7
Pages
1624-1633
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1978467927
Cited by
192
References
5
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How much can current interventions reduce colorectal cancer mortality in the U.S.?: Mortality projections for scenarios of risk‐factor modification, screening, and treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22115
The paper
Vogelaar, I., van Ballegooijen, M., Schrag, D., Boer, R., Winawer, S. J., Habbema, J. D. F., & Zauber, A. G. (2006). How much can current interventions reduce colorectal cancer mortality in the U.S.?: Mortality projections for scenarios of risk‐factor modification, screening, and treatment. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22115

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.