Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 434

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High‐dose interleukin‐2 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of response and survival in patients treated in the surgery branch at the National Cancer Institute between 1986 and 2006

Open access
Klapper, Jacob A., Downey, Stephanie G., Smith, Franz O., Yang, James C., Hughes, Marybeth S., Kammula, Udai S., Sherry, Richard M., Royal, Richard E., Steinberg, Seth M., Rosenberg, Steven·2008·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with high‐dose interleukin‐2 (HD IL‐2) has resulted in durable tumor regression in a minority of patients. The current study presents the authors' 20‐year experience administering this immunotherapeutic agent. METHODS.: Patients with metastatic RCC (n = 259) were treated with HD IL‐2 alone from January 13, 1986 through December 31, 2006 at the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute. Potential predictive factors for response and survival, both pretreatment and treatment‐related, were first subjected to univariate analysis and then to multivariate logistic regression or a Cox proportional hazards model. Finally, the authors investigated Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic factors for survival to assess their predictive value in the patient population in the current study. RESULTS.: A total of 23 patients experienced a complete response and 30 patients achieved a partial response, for an overall objective response rate of 20%. All partial responders had developed disease recurrence at the time of last follow‒up, but only 4 complete responders had experienced disease recurrence by that time. Despite toxicities, only 2 patients developed treatment‐related mortalities over this same time period. A higher baseline weight (P = .05) and MSKCC prognostic factors (P = .02) were found to be the variables most associated with response. For survival >4 years and overall survival, several pretreatment and treatment‒related factors maintained significance, but none more so than response (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS.: HD IL‐2 can induce complete tumor regression in a small number of patients, and many patients have experienced extended disease‐free intervals. Given its relative safety, HD IL‐2 should still be considered a first‐line therapy in patients with metastatic RCC who have an overall good performance status. Cancer 2008. Published 2008 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.23552

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 434

Metadata

Authors
Klapper, J. A., Downey, S. G., Smith, F. O., Yang, J. C., Hughes, M. S., Kammula, U. S., Sherry, R. M., Royal, R. E., Steinberg, S. M., & Rosenberg, S.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-08
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
293-301
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1992350807
Cited by
434
References
24
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐dose interleukin‐2 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of response and survival in patients treated in the surgery branch at the National Cancer Institute between 1986 and 2006. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23552
The paper
Klapper, J. A., Downey, S. G., Smith, F. O., Yang, J. C., Hughes, M. S., Kammula, U. S., Sherry, R. M., Royal, R. E., Steinberg, S. M., & Rosenberg, S. (2008). High‐dose interleukin‐2 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of response and survival in patients treated in the surgery branch at the National Cancer Institute between 1986 and 2006. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23552

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.