Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 712

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Girdles: Results of the Italian Randomized Cooperative Trial

Frustaci, Sergio, Gherlinzoni, Franco, De Paoli, Antonino, Bonetti, Marco, Azzarelli, Alberto, Comandone, Alessandro, Olmi, Patrizia, Buonadonna, Angela, Pignatti, Giovanni, Barbieri, Enza, Apice, Gaetano, Zmerly, Hassan, Serraino, Diego, Picci, Piero·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma is controversial because previous trials reported conflicting results. The present study was designed with restricted selection criteria and high dose-intensities of the two most active chemotherapeutic agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients between 18 and 65 years of age with grade 3 to 4 spindle-cell sarcomas (primary diameter ≥ 5 cm or any size recurrent tumor) in extremities or girdles were eligible. Stratification was by primary versus recurrent tumors and by tumor diameter greater than or equal to 10 cm versus less than 10 cm. One hundred four patients were randomized, 51 to the control group and 53 to the treatment group (five cycles of 4′-epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m 2 days 1 and 2 and ifosfamide 1.8 g/m 2 days 1 through 5, with hydration, mesna, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 59 months, 60 patients had relapsed and 48 died (28 and 20 in the treatment arm and 32 and 28 in the control arm, respectively). The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 48 months in the treatment group and 16 months in the control group (P = .04); and the median overall survival (OS) was 75 months for treated and 46 months for untreated patients (P = .03). For OS, the absolute benefit deriving from chemotherapy was 13% at 2 years and increased to 19% at 4 years (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Intensified adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive impact on the DFS and OS of patients with high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas at a median follow-up of 59 months. Therefore, our data favor an intensified treatment in similar cases. Although cure is still difficult to achieve, a significant delay in death is worthwhile, also considering the short duration of treatment and the absence of toxic deaths.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1238

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 712

Metadata

Authors
Frustaci, S., Gherlinzoni, F., De Paoli, A., Bonetti, M., Azzarelli, A., Comandone, A., Olmi, P., Buonadonna, A., Pignatti, G., Barbieri, E., Apice, G., Zmerly, H., Serraino, D., & Picci, P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
1238-1247
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1912227677
Cited by
712
References
2
FWCI
22.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Girdles: Results of the Italian Randomized Cooperative Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1238
The paper
Frustaci, S., Gherlinzoni, F., De Paoli, A., Bonetti, M., Azzarelli, A., Comandone, A., Olmi, P., Buonadonna, A., Pignatti, G., Barbieri, E., Apice, G., Zmerly, H., Serraino, D., & Picci, P. (2001). Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Girdles: Results of the Italian Randomized Cooperative Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1238

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.