The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A population‐based study of prevalence of complementary methods use by cancer survivors: A report from the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND.: The use of complementary methods (CMs) is widespread and increasing in the United States. Most literature on CM use among cancer survivors focuses on the treatment period, whereas only a few studies address use further along the cancer continuum. METHODS.: This study analyzed the prevalence and the medical and demographic associations of CM use among cancer survivors surveyed 10 to 24 months after diagnosis. The study's sample—4139 survivors of 1 of 10 adult cancers—was selected from stratified random samples provided by statewide cancer registries and surveyed by mail and telephone. Three logistic regression models examined associations between medical and demographic factors and CM use among survivors of sex‐specific and non–sex‐specific cancers. RESULTS.: Of the 19 CMs included in the survey, the CMs most frequently reported were prayer/spiritual practice (61.4%), relaxation (44.3%), faith/spiritual healing (42.4%), nutritional supplements/vitamins (40.1%), meditation (15%), religious counseling (11.3%), massage (11.2%), and support groups (9.7%). Among these 19 CMs, the least prevalent were hypnosis (0.4%), biofeedback therapy (1.0%), and acupuncture/acupressure (1.2%). Survivors more likely to use CMs were female, younger, white, higher income, and more educated. CONCLUSIONS.: This study provides information regarding prevalence and medical–demographic determinants of CM use reported by a large, population‐based sample of survivors of 10 cancers surveyed 10 to 24 months after diagnosis. These findings may be used by clinicians and researchers to inform their decisions regarding which CMs to address in practice and research. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unconventional medicine in the United States-Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use
Eisenberg, D. M., Kessler, R. C., Foster, C., Norlock, F. E., Calkins, D. R., & Delbanco, T. L. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199301283280406 · Cited by 4,177 · cited 1×
“In 1990, the first survey of CAM use in the general US population found that 34% of adults reported having used at least 1 of 16 CAMs in the past year.(4) An analysis of data from the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS; N 5 31,044), found that when the definition of CAMs included ‘‘prayer for health reasons,’…”
BackgroundPatterns of health behavior in U.S. adults
Berrigan, D., Dodd, K., Troiano, R. P., Krebs-Smith, S. M., & Barbash, R. B. (2003) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00067-1 · Cited by 382
Art therapy improves coping resources: A randomized, controlled study among women with breast cancer
ÖSTER, I., SVENSK, A.-C., MAGNUSSON, E., THYME, K. E., SJÕDIN, M., ÅSTRÖM, S., & LINDH, J. (2006) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s147895150606007x · Cited by 173
Cited by
Johnson, S. B., Park, H. S., Gross, C. P., & Yu, J. B. (2018) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2487 · Cited by 325
Use of Alternative Medicine for Cancer and Its Impact on Survival
Johnson, S. B., Park, H. S., Gross, C. P., & Yu, J. B. (2018) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djx145 · Cited by 322
Greenlee, H., Kwan, M. L., Ergas, I. J., Sherman, K. J., Krathwohl, S. E., Bonnell, C., Lee, M. M., & Kushi, L. H. (2009) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0315-3 · Cited by 117
Mantoudi, A., Parpa, E., Tsilika, E., Batistaki, C., Nikoloudi, M., Kouloulias, V., Kostopoulou, S., Galanos, A., & Mystakidou, K. (2020) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2019.0402 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Gansler, T., Kaw, C., Crammer, C., & Smith, T.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-20
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1048-1057
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1964445863
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A population‐based study of prevalence of complementary methods use by cancer survivors: A report from the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23659
- The paper
- Gansler, T., Kaw, C., Crammer, C., & Smith, T. (2008). A population‐based study of prevalence of complementary methods use by cancer survivors: A report from the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.