Cited by 382Health and Lifestyle StudiesHealth and Wellbeing ResearchCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Patterns of health behavior in U.S. adults

Berrigan, David, Dodd, Kevin, Troiano, Richard P., Krebs-Smith, Susan M., Barbash, Rachel Ballard·2003·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Associations between health-related behaviors are important for two reasons. First, disease prevention and health promotion depend on understanding both prevalence of health behaviors and associations among such behaviors. Second, behaviors may have synergistic effects on disease risk.Methods We document patterns of adherence to recommendations concerning five behaviors (physical activity, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, fruit and vegetable consumption, and dietary fat intake) in U.S. adults (n = 15,425) using data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Division of individuals into categories associated with adherence or nonadherence to lifestyle recommendations results in 32 patterns of adherence/nonadherence.Results Proportions of U.S. adults with 21 of 32 behavior patterns characterized here deviated from proportions expected if health behaviors are independent of each other. The two extreme patterns, all adherence (5.9%) and all nonadherence (4.9%), were found in about double the proportion expected. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, and income were associated with a number of patterns, including the two extremes.Conclusions This analysis of behavior patterns highlights population subgroups of public health importance, provides a benchmark for studies of multivariate associations between health behaviors, and supports a multidimensional model of health behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00067-1

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berrigan, D., Dodd, K., Troiano, R. P., Krebs-Smith, S. M., & Barbash, R. B.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Berrigan, David
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
615-623
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026395256
Cited by
382
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
34.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
health behavior patterns, lifestyle adherence, physical activity, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, fruit and vegetable intake, dietary fat intake, disease prevention, health promotion, sociodemographic differences
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Demography, Ethnicity, Female, Fruit, Health Surveys, Humans, Life Style, Male, Patient Compliance, United States, Vegetables, Health Behavior, Exercise, Diet, Fat-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review