Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality

Open access
Hur, Chin, Miller, Melecia, Kong, Chung Yin, Dowling, Emily C., Nattinger, Kevin J., Dunn, Michelle, Feuer, Eric J.·2013·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past several decades, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has rapidly increased. The purpose of this analysis was to examine temporal trends in EAC incidence and mortality within the US population and, in addition, to explore these trends within subgroups of the population. METHODS: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER 9) data were used to examine incidence and incidence‐based (IB) mortality in EAC from 1975 to 2009. Secular trends in incidence and IB mortality by cancer stage, sex, and race were further characterized using the NCI's Joinpoint Regression program. RESULTS: Based on SEER 9 data, EAC incidence and IB mortality continues to increase in the United States. However, since the mid‐1990s, the overall rate of increase in both EAC incidence and IB mortality appears to be slowing. In addition, in early‐stage cancers, there is a noticeable leveling off of IB mortality rates and divergence from incidence starting in the late 1990s. Over the study period, the average annual percentage increase in incidence was 6.1% in men and 5.9% in women. CONCLUSIONS: EAC incidence and IB mortality rates continue to rise in the United States, although at a slower rate in more recent years. In early‐stage cancers, IB mortality and incidence rates have diverged primarily because IB mortality rates have plateaued beginning in the late 1990s. Although EAC continues to be less common in women, the rate of increase in EAC incidence is similar in both sexes. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.27834

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 507

Metadata

Authors
Hur, C., Miller, M., Kong, C. Y., Dowling, E. C., Nattinger, K. J., Dunn, M., & Feuer, E. J.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-11
Volume
119
Issue
6
Pages
1149-1158
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1606124548
Cited by
507
References
19
FWCI
29.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.27834
The paper
Hur, C., Miller, M., Kong, C. Y., Dowling, E. C., Nattinger, K. J., Dunn, M., & Feuer, E. J. (2013). Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27834

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.