Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 454

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of timing and setting of palliative care referral on quality of end‐of‐life care in cancer patients

Open access
Hui, David, Kim, Sun Hyun, Roquemore, Joyce, Dev, Rony, Chisholm, Gary, Bruera, Eduardo·2014·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on how the timing and setting of palliative care (PC) referral can affect end‐of‐life care. In this retrospective cohort study, the authors examined how the timing and setting of PC referral were associated with the quality of end‐of‐life care. METHODS: All adult patients residing in the Houston area who died of advanced cancer between September 1, 2009 and February 28, 2010 and had a PC consultation were included. Data were retrieved on PC referral and quality of end‐of‐life care indicators. RESULTS: Among 366 decedents, 120 (33%) had an early PC referral (>3 months before death), and 169 (46%) were first seen as outpatients. Earlier PC referral was associated with fewer emergency room visits (39% vs 68%; P < .001), fewer hospitalizations (48% vs 81%; P < .003), and fewer hospital deaths (17% vs 31%; P = .004) in the last 30 days of life. Similarly, outpatient PC referral was associated with fewer emergency room visits (48% vs 68%; P < .001), fewer hospital admissions (52% vs 86%; P < .001), fewer hospital deaths (18% vs 34%; P = .001), and fewer intensive care unit admissions (4% vs 14%; P = .001). In multivariate analysis, outpatient PC referral (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28‐0.66; P < .001) was independently associated with less aggressive end‐of‐life care. Men (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.06‐2.50; P = .03) and hematologic malignancies (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.18‐5.59; P = .02) were associated with more aggressive end‐of‐life care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were referred to outpatient PC had improved end‐of‐life care compared with those who received inpatient PC. The current findings support the need to increase the availability of PC clinics and to streamline the process of early referral. Cancer 2014;120:1743–1749. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.28628

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 454

Metadata

Authors
Hui, D., Kim, S. H., Roquemore, J., Dev, R., Chisholm, G., & Bruera, E.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-22
Volume
120
Issue
11
Pages
1743-1749
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1502426630
Cited by
454
References
23
FWCI
28.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of timing and setting of palliative care referral on quality of end‐of‐life care in cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.28628
The paper
Hui, D., Kim, S. H., Roquemore, J., Dev, R., Chisholm, G., & Bruera, E. (2014). Impact of timing and setting of palliative care referral on quality of end‐of‐life care in cancer patients. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28628

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.