Cited by 194Cancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mindfulness‐based cancer recovery and supportive‐expressive therapy maintain telomere length relative to controls in distressed breast cancer survivors

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Group psychosocial interventions including mindfulness-based cancer recovery (MBCR) and supportive-expressive group therapy (SET) can help breast cancer survivors decrease distress and influence cortisol levels. Although telomere length (TL) has been associated with breast cancer prognosis, the impact of these two interventions on TL has not been studied to date. METHODS: The objective of the current study was to compare the effects of MBCR and SET with a minimal intervention control condition (a 1-day stress management seminar) on TL in distressed breast cancer survivors in a randomized controlled trial. MBCR focused on training in mindfulness meditation and gentle Hatha yoga whereas SET focused on emotional expression and group support. The primary outcome measure was relative TL, the telomere/single-copy gene ratio, assessed before and after each intervention. Secondary outcomes were self-reported mood and stress symptoms. RESULTS: Eighty-eight distressed breast cancer survivors with a diagnosis of stage I to III cancer (using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system) who had completed treatment at least 3 months prior participated. Using analyses of covariance on a per-protocol sample, there were no differences noted between the MBCR and SET groups with regard to the telomere/single-copy gene ratio, but a trend effect was observed between the combined intervention group and controls (F [1,84], 3.82; P = .054; η(2) = .043); TL in the intervention group was maintained whereas it was found to decrease for control participants. There were no associations noted between changes in TL and changes in mood or stress scores over time. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions providing stress reduction and emotional support resulted in trends toward TL maintenance in distressed breast cancer survivors, compared with decreases in usual care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.29063

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, 2007, Prevalence Database. US Estimated Complete Prevalence Counts on 1/1/2004
  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2008, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. NCCN Practice Guidelines for the Management of Psychosocial Distress
  3. Carlson LE, 2010, Mindfulness‐Based Cancer Recovery: A Step‐By‐Step MBSR Approach to Help You Cope With Treatment and Reclaim Your Life
  4. Classen C, 1993, Brief Supportive‐Expressive Group Therapy for Women With Primary Breast Cancer: A Treatment Manual
  5. Leckie MS, 1979, Symptoms of Stress Inventory

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Carlson, L. E., Beattie, T. L., Giese‐Davis, J., Faris, P., Tamagawa, R., Fick, L. J., Degelman, E. S., & Speca, M.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Carlson, Linda E.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-03
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
476-484
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2150614340
Cited by
194
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Alberta Cancer Foundation (25010)
  • Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (17728)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Keywords
supportive-expressive group therapy, telomere length, breast cancer survivors, psychological distress, psychosocial interventions, stress reduction, hatha yoga, mindfulness meditation, emotional expression, mood, cortisol
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Yoga, Telomere, Survivors, Meditation, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review