Cited by 43Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchMRI in cancer diagnosisRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Imaging-based biomarkers: changes in the tumor interface of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on computed tomography scans indicate response to cytotoxic therapy

Open access
Amer, Ahmed M., Zaid, Mohamed, Chaudhury, Baishali, Elganainy, Dalia, Lee, Yeonju, Wilke, Christopher T., Cloyd, Jordan, Wang, Huamin +19 more·2018·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) response to therapy remains challenging. The objective of this study was to investigate whether changes in the tumor/parenchyma interface are associated with response. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans before and after therapy were reviewed in 4 cohorts: cohort 1 (99 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery); cohort 2 (86 patients with stage IV PDAC who received chemotherapy), cohort 3 (94 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received protocol‐based neoadjuvant gemcitabine chemoradiation), and cohort 4 (47 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and were prospectively followed in a registry). The tumor/parenchyma interface was visually classified as either a type I response (the interface remained or became well defined) or a type II response (the interface became poorly defined) after therapy. Consensus (cohorts 1‐3) and individual (cohort 4) visual scoring was performed. Changes in enhancement at the interface were quantified using a proprietary platform. RESULTS: In cohort 1, type I responders had a greater probability of achieving a complete or near‐complete pathologic response (21% vs 0%; P = .01). For cohorts 1, 2, and 3, type I responders had significantly longer disease‐free and overall survival, independent of traditional covariates of outcomes and of baseline and normalized cancer antigen 19‐9 levels. In cohort 4, 2 senior radiologists achieved a κ value of 0.8, and the interface score was associated with overall survival. The quantitative method revealed high specificity and sensitivity in classifying patients as type I or type II responders (with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.92 in cohort 1, 0.96 in cohort 2, and 0.89 in cohort 3). CONCLUSIONS: Changes at the PDAC/parenchyma interface may serve as an early predictor of response to therapy. Cancer 2018;124:1701‐9. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.31251

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radiomics and quantitative imaging studies have shown that enhancement and morphology of primary pancreatic tumours have biological underpinnings and clinical relevance.

    “Other applications of radiomics and quantitative imaging approaches have shown that the enhancement and morphology of the primary tumours have biological underpinnings and clinical relevance,113–115”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [113]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amer, A. M., Zaid, M., Chaudhury, B., Elganainy, D., Lee, Y., Wilke, C. T., Cloyd, J., Wang, H., Maitra, A., Wolff, R. A., Varadhachary, G., Overman, M. J., Lee, J. E., Fleming, J. B., Tzeng, C. W., Katz, M. H., Holliday, E. B., Krishnan, S., Minsky, B. D., Herman, J. M., Taniguchi, C. M., Das, P., Crane, C. H., Le, O., Bhosale, P., Tamm, E. P., & Koay, E. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Koay, Eugene J.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-25
Volume
124
Issue
8
Pages
1701-1709
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2791078127
Cited by
43
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • GE Healthcare
  • National Institutes of Health (U54CA210181‐01, U54CA143837, U01CA196403)
  • Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (14‐20‐25‐KOAY)
  • Radiological Society of North America (RSD1429)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, treatment response prediction, imaging biomarkers, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy response, pathological response, survival prediction, CA19-9, early response assessment, stage IV pancreatic cancer
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreatectomy, Pancreatic Ducts, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Chemoradiotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review