Cited by 6,712Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Treatment and PharmacologyPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

Increased Survival in Pancreatic Cancer with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine

Open access
Von Hoff, Daniel D., Ervin, Thomas, Arena, Francis P., Chiorean, E. Gabriela, Infante, Jeffrey, Moore, Malcolm, Seay, Thomas, Tjulandin, Sergei A. +15 more·2013·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a phase 1-2 trial of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus gemcitabine, substantial clinical activity was noted in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We conducted a phase 3 study of the efficacy and safety of the combination versus gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with a Karnofsky performance-status score of 70 or more (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance status) to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or gemcitabine monotherapy (1000 mg per square meter) weekly for 7 of 8 weeks (cycle 1) and then on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (cycle 2 and subsequent cycles). Patients received the study treatment until disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall response rate. RESULTS: A total of 861 patients were randomly assigned to nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (431 patients) or gemcitabine (430). The median overall survival was 8.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group as compared with 6.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.83; P<0.001). The survival rate was 35% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group versus 22% in the gemcitabine group at 1 year, and 9% versus 4% at 2 years. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, as compared with 3.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.82; P<0.001); the response rate according to independent review was 23% versus 7% in the two groups (P<0.001). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (38% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group vs. 27% in the gemcitabine group), fatigue (17% vs. 7%), and neuropathy (17% vs. 1%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3% versus 1% of the patients in the two groups. In the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, neuropathy of grade 3 or higher improved to grade 1 or lower in a median of 29 days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate, but rates of peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression were increased. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00844649.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1304369

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy are ineffective because most patients are already in the progressive stage with local invasion and distant metastases at detection time.

    “Most chemotherapy 5-7, targeted therapy 8, and immunotherapy 9-11 are ineffective because most patients are already in the progressive stage with local invasion and distant metastases at the detection time 12,13.”

    From Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Methods (Patients; page not provided) describe a trial limited to patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, and the Results (Efficacy; page not provided) mention patients whose cancer was metastatic at initial diagnosis. The paper does not establish that most patients have local invasion or distant metastases when detected, or that late detection causes the therapies’ limited effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the past decade, FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel became first-line therapies for advanced PDAC.

    “two new combination regimens have emerged as the first-line therapy in patients with advanced PDAC. The first is a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, which carries the acronym FOLFIRINOX. The second is the combination of gemcitabine and an albumin nanoparticle conjugate of paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel)8,9.”

    From Pancreatic cancer: Advances and challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

  • Polychemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is considered the standard of care for patients with metastatic PDAC.

    “Polychemotherapy, either with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan and oxaliplatin in combination with folinic acid (FOLFIRINOX), or with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP), is considered the standard of care for patients suffering from metastatic PDAC (mPDAC)3,4.”
  • Less than half of all patients with metastatic PDAC are responsive to therapy.

    “However, less than half of all patients are responsive to the therapy, and patients who do not respond (NR patients) suffer from pain and eventually die within weeks3.”
  • Less than half of all patients respond to the primary treatment for PDAC, chemotherapy.

    “Less than half of all patients respond to the primary treatment for PDAC, chemotherapy3,4”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Von Hoff, D. D., Ervin, T., Arena, F. P., Chiorean, E. G., Infante, J., Moore, M., Seay, T., Tjulandin, S. A., Ma, W. W., Saleh, M. N., Harris, M., Reni, M., Dowden, S., Laheru, D., Bahary, N., Ramanathan, R. K., Tabernero, J., Hidalgo, M., Goldstein, D., Van Cutsem, E., Wei, X., Iglesias, J., & Renschler, M. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Tennessee Oncology (US)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
  • Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin (RU)
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • Georgia Cancer Specialists (US)
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
  • Celgene (United States) (US)
  • Bionomics (Australia) (AU)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2013-10-31
Volume
369
Issue
18
Pages
1691-1703
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2165480504
Cited by
6,712
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 403 · 2025: 491 · 2024: 537 · 2023: 607 · 2022: 614 · 2021: 695 · 2020: 631 · 2019: 531 · 2018: 548 · 2017: 512 · 2016: 423 · 2015: 424 · 2014: 271 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
200.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA006973)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, metastatic pancreatic cancer, nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, combination chemotherapy, gemcitabine monotherapy, overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate, treatment safety, adverse events, chemotherapy schedule, Karnofsky performance status
MeSH terms
Gemcitabine, Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Albumins, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Deoxycytidine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Neutropenia, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Paclitaxel, Disease-Free Survival, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review