The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Afatinib plus bevacizumab combination after acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR ‐mutant non–small cell lung cancer: Multicenter, single‐arm, phase 2 trial (ABC Study)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggested that the addition of bevacizumab could overcome acquired resistance (AR) to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a combination of afatinib and bevacizumab after AR. METHODS: Patients with EGFR ‐mutant non–small cell lung cancer after AR were enrolled during any line of therapy. Afatinib was prescribed at 30 mg, and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab was administered every 3 weeks until progression. RESULTS: Between October 2014 and May 2017, 32 eligible patients were evaluated. The mutation subtypes were Del‐19 (20 [63%]), L858R (11 [34%]), and L861Q (1 [3%]). T790M was detected in 14 patients (44%). The median number of prior regimens was 4 (range, 1‐10). Six patients obtained a partial response, and 23 had stable disease; this resulted in an objective response rate (ORR) of 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2%‐36.4%) and a disease control rate of 90.7% (95% CI, 75.0%‐98.0%). The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 6.3 months (95% CI, 3.9‐8.7 months). The ORRs and median PFS times of T790M+ and T790M− patients were 14.3% and 22.2%, respectively, and 6.3 and 7.1 months, respectively; those of Del‐19 and L858R patients were 20.0% and 11.1%, respectively, and 6.3 and 5.1 months, respectively. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (incidence ≥ 10%) included paronychia (25%), hypertension (41%), and proteinuria (19%). There were no treatment‐related deaths, interstitial lung disease, or bevacizumab‐associated severe bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Afatinib plus bevacizumab demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety after AR to EGFR TKIs and could be a therapeutic salvage option for T790M− populations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of afatinib with EGFR antibodies or bevacizumab has shown promise but some may be associated with considerable treatment-related toxicities.
“Other approaches include the combination of afatinib with EGFR antibodies or bevacizumab, which have shown promise but some may be associated with considerable treatment-related toxicities.”
From Afatinib for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings (2020) · cites this paper as [106]
Citations
Cites
Osimertinib or Platinum–Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M–Positive Lung Cancer
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Ahn, M.-J., Garassino, M. C., Kim, H. R., Ramalingam, S. S., Shepherd, F. A., He, Y., Akamatsu, H., Theelen, W. S. M. E., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1612674 · Cited by 3,379
Miller, V. A., Hirsh, V., Cadranel, J., Chen, Y.-M., Park, K., Kim, S.-W., Zhou, C., Su, W.-C., Wang, M., Sun, Y., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70087-6 · Cited by 961
Solca, F., Dahl, G., Zoephel, A., Bader, G., Sanderson, M., Klein, C., Kraemer, O., Himmelsbach, F., Haaksma, E., & Adolf, G. R. (2012) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.112.197756 · Cited by 865 · cited 5×
“Afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, showed preclinical effectiveness against many EGFR-mutant cell lines, including those with T790M.(12,13) Although those preclinical studies led us to expect that afatinib would overcome AR to EGFR TKIs, irreversible EGFR TKI monotherapies such as afatinib and dacomitinib…”
BackgroundInfluentialSoria, J.-C., Wu, Y.-L., Nakagawa, K., Kim, S.-W., Yang, J.-J., Ahn, M.-J., Wang, J., Yang, J. C.-H., Lu, Y., Atagi, S., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00121-7 · Cited by 413 · cited 11×
“%) who underwent afatinib-bevacizumab therapy were directly switched from other EGFR TKIs.”
ResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1056/NEJMoa040938 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1099314 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature05945 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1736 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020073 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa044238 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1141478 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2246 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1411817 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/onc.2008.109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.0981 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70472-3 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa061884 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70381-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000434 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2904 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4204 · DOI
- 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0885 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7049 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0331 · DOI
- 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822956e8 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.10.2095 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.12.002 · DOI
- 10.21037/tlcr.2016.12.02 · DOI
- 10.1111/cas.12996 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.11.025 · DOI
- 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0326 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.04.001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Afatinib for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings
Harvey, R. D., Adams, V. R., Beardslee, T., & Medina, P. (2020) · Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/1078155220931926 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Hata, A., Katakami, N., Kaji, R., Yokoyama, T., Kaneda, T., Tamiya, M., Inoue, T., Kimura, H., Yano, Y., Tamura, D., Morita, S., Negoro, S., & the HANSHIN Oncology Group, F.
- Affiliations
- Kobe Medical Center (JP)
- Kurashiki Central Hospital (JP)
- Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP)
- Toneyama National Hospital (JP)
- Kobe University (JP)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Takarazuka City Hospital (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Hata, Akito
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-07
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3830-3838
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2891059887
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- afatinib, bevacizumab, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, acquired resistance, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, T790M, combination therapy, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, progression-free survival, adverse events, paronychia, hypertension, proteinuria, L858R
- MeSH terms
- Bevacizumab, Afatinib, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Treatment Outcome, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review