Cited by 2,426Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Chemotherapy

Open access
Hanna, Nasser, Shepherd, Frances A., Fossella, Frank V., Pereira, Jose R., De Marinis, Filippo, von Pawel, Joachim, Gatzemeier, Ulrich, Tsao, Thomas Chang Yao +12 more·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) day 1 with vitamin B(12), folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Overall response rates were 9.1% and 8.8% (analysis of variance P =.105) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months (P = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7%. Patients receiving docetaxel were more likely to have grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40.2% v 5.3%; P <.001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% v 1.9%; P <.001), neutropenia with infections (3.3% v 0.0%; P =.004), hospitalizations for neutropenic fever (13.4% v 1.5%; P <.001), hospitalizations due to other drug related adverse events (10.5% v 6.4%; P =.092), use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (19.2% v 2.6%, P <.001) and all grade alopecia (37.7% v 6.4%; P <.001) compared with patients receiving pemetrexed. CONCLUSION: Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-line NSCLC when available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.08.163

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanna, N., Shepherd, F. A., Fossella, F. V., Pereira, J. R., De Marinis, F., von Pawel, J., Gatzemeier, U., Tsao, T. C. Y., Pless, M., Muller, T., Lim, H.-L., Desch, C., Szondy, K., Gervais, R., Shaharyar, Manegold, C., Paul, S., Paoletti, P., Einhorn, L., & Bunn, P. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital...
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1589-1597
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2134667653
Cited by
2,426
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 175 · 2013: 171 · 2012: 159
FWCI
110.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
pemetrexed, docetaxel, non-small cell lung cancer, second-line chemotherapy, overall survival, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, hair loss, treatment toxicity, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, progression-free survival, overall response rate, previously treated patients, dexamethasone
MeSH terms
Pemetrexed, Docetaxel, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Glutamates, Guanine, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neutropenia, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Taxoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review