Cited by 63Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCancer survivorship and careGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Cancer diagnosis and risk of suicide after accounting for prediagnosis psychiatric care: A matched‐cohort study of patients with incident solid‐organ malignancies

Open access
Klaassen, Zachary, Wallis, Christopher J.D., Chandrasekar, Thenappan, Goldberg, Hanan, Sayyid, Rashid K., Williams, Stephen B., Moses, Kelvin A., Terris, Martha K. +5 more·2019·Cancer

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated an association between a diagnosis of cancer and the risk of suicide; however, they failed to account for psychiatric care before a cancer diagnosis, which may confound this relationship. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a cancer diagnosis on the risk of suicide, accounting for prediagnosis psychiatric care utilization. Methods: All adult residents of Ontario, Canada who were diagnosed with cancer (1 of prostate, breast, colorectal, melanoma, lung, bladder, endometrial, thyroid, kidney, or oral cancer) between 1997 and 2014 were identified. Noncancer controls were matched 4:1 based on sociodemographics, including a psychiatric utilization gradient (PUG) score (with 0 indicating none; 1, outpatient; 2, emergency department; and 3, hospital admission). A marginal, cause‐specific hazard model was used to assess the effect of cancer on the risk of suicidal death. Results: Among 676,470 patients with cancer and 2,152,682 matched noncancer controls, there were 8.2 and 11.4 suicides per 1000 person‐years of follow‐up, respectively. Patients with cancer had an overall higher risk of suicidal death compared with matched patients without cancer (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.22‐1.48). This effect was pronounced in the first 50 months after cancer diagnosis (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.42‐1.81); patients with cancer did not demonstrate an increased risk thereafter. Among individuals with a PUG score 0 or 1, those with cancer were significantly more likely to die of suicide compared with controls. There was no difference in suicide risk between patients with cancer and controls for those who had a PUG score of 2 or 3. Conclusions: A cancer diagnosis is associated with increased risk of death from suicide compared with the general population even after accounting for precancer diagnosis psychiatric care utilization. The specific factors underlying the observed associations remain to be elucidated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.32146

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The statistically nonsignificant tendency toward lower suicide risks observed in women with cancer may be due to greater resilience and stronger social and psychological support in women than in men with cancer.

    “The statistically nonsignificant tendency toward lower suicide risks observed in women with cancer may be due to greater resilience and stronger social and psychological support in women than in men with cancer 51 .”

    From Suicide risk and mortality among patients with cancer (2022) · cites this paper as [51]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Williams JI, Young W. A summary of studies on the quality of health care administrative databases in Canada. In: Goel V, Williams JI, Anderson GM,, eds. Patterns of Health Care in Ontario 2nd ed. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Medical Association; 1996: 339– 345.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klaassen, Z., Wallis, C. J. D., Chandrasekar, T., Goldberg, H., Sayyid, R. K., Williams, S. B., Moses, K. A., Terris, M. K., Nam, R. K., Urbach, D., Austin, P. C., Kurdyak, P., & Kulkarni, G. S.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Augusta University (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Kulkarni, Girish S.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-25
Volume
125
Issue
16
Pages
2886-2895
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2942339464
Cited by
63
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Urological Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
suicide, suicide mortality, psychiatric service utilization, solid organ malignancies, cancer diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Ontario, Psychotherapy, Risk Factors, Suicide, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review