Cited by 36PARP inhibition in cancer therapyBRCA gene mutations in cancerOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Molecular and Clinical Predictors of Improvement in Progression‐free Survival with Maintenance PARP Inhibitor Therapy in Women with Platinum‐sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta‐analysis

Open access
Lee, Chee Khoon, Friedlander, Michael L., Tjokrowidjaja, Angelina, Ledermann, Jonathan A., Coleman, Robert L., Mirza, Mansoor R., Matulonis, Ursula A., Pujade‐Lauraine, Eric +6 more·2021·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors performed a meta-analysis to better quantify the benefit of maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy to inform practice in platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade ovarian cancer for patient subsets with the following characteristics: germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm), somatic BRCA mutation (sBRCAm), wild-type BRCA but homologous recombinant-deficient (HRD), homologous recombinant-proficient (HRP), and baseline clinical prognostic characteristics. METHODS: Randomized trials comparing a PARPi versus placebo as maintenance treatment were identified from electronic databases. Treatment estimates of progression-free survival were pooled across trials using the inverse variance weighted method. RESULTS: Four trials included 972 patients who received a PARPi (olaparib, 31%; niraparib, 35%; or rucaparib, 34%) and 530 patients who received placebo. For patients who had germline BRCA1 mutation (gBRCAm1) (N = 471), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.23-0.37); for those who had germline BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm2) (N = 236), the HR was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.17-0.39); and, for those who had sBRCAm (N = 123), the HR was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.12-0.41). The treatment effect was similar between the gBRCAm and sBRCAm subsets (P = .48). In patients who had wild-type BRCA HRD tumors (excluding sBRCAm; N = 309), the HR was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.31-0.56); and, in those who had wild-type BRCA HRP tumors (N = 346), the HR was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.83). The relative treatment effect was greater for the BRCAm versus HRD (P = .03), BRCAm versus HRP (P < .00001), and HRD versus HRP (P < .00001) subsets. There was no difference in benefit based on age, response after recent chemotherapy, and prior bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: In platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade ovarian cancer, maintenance PARPi improves progression-free survival for all patient subsets. PARPi therapy has a similar magnitude of benefit for sBRCAm and gBRCAm. Although patients with BRCAm derive the greatest benefit, the absence of a BRCAm or HRD could not be used to exclude patients from maintenance PARPi therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.33517

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional analyses, alongside molecular assays, are required to confirm the predicted response of women with ovarian cancer to PARP inhibitors such as olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib.

    “Functional analyses, alongside molecular assays, are required to confirm the predicted response of women with ovarian cancer to PARPis such as the FDA-approved drugs olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib (Dickson et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2021; Valabrega et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bell D, Berchuck A, Birrer M, et al. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474: 609-615.
  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2020;70: 7-30.
  3. Moynahan ME, Chiu JW, Koller BH, Jasin M. Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair. Molecular Cell. 1999;4: 511-518.
  4. Moynahan ME, Pierce AJ, Jasin M. BRCA2 Is Required for Homology-Directed Repair of Chromosomal Breaks. Molecular Cell. 2001;7: 263-272.
  5. Press JZ, De Luca A, Boyd N, et al. Ovarian carcinomas with genetic and epigenetic BRCA1 loss have distinct molecular abnormalities. BMC cancer. 2008;8: 17-17.
  6. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Bell D, Berchuck A, et al. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474: 609.
  7. Scott CL, Swisher EM, Kaufmann SH. Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors: Recent Advances and Future Development. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015;33: 1397-1406.
  8. Bell D, Berchuck A, Birrer M, et al. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474: 609-615.
  9. Merajver SD, Pham TM, Caduff RF, et al. Somatic mutations in the BRCA1 gene in sporadic ovarian tumours. Nature Genetics. 1995;9: 439-443.
  10. Hennessy BTJ, Timms KM, Carey MS, et al. Somatic Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Could Expand the Number of Patients That Benefit From Poly (ADP Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28: 3570-3576.
  11. Foster KA, Harrington P, Kerr J, et al. Somatic and Germline Mutations of the BRCA2 Gene in Sporadic Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Research. 1996;56: 3622-3625.
  12. Dann RB, DeLoia JA, Timms KM, et al. BRCA1/2 mutations and expression: Response to platinum chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012;125: 677-682.
  13. Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, et al. BRCA Mutation Frequency and Patterns of Treatment Response in BRCA Mutation-Positive Women With Ovarian Cancer: A Report From the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30: 2654-2663.
  14. Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J, et al. Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum- Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375: 2154-2164.
  15. Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C, et al. Olaparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum- Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366: 1382-1392.
  16. Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C, et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2014;15: 852- 861.
  17. Coleman RL, Oza AM, Lorusso D, et al. Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2017;390: 1949-1961.
  18. Pujade-Lauraine E, Ledermann JA, Selle F, et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2017;18: 1274-1284.
  19. Borenstein M, Higgins JP. Meta-analysis and subgroups. Prev Sci. 2013;14: 134-143.
  20. Miller RE, Leary A, Scott CL, et al. ESMO recommendations on predictive biomarker testing for homologous recombination deficiency and PARP inhibitor benefit in ovarian cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2020;31: 1606-1622.
  21. Pennington KP, Walsh T, Harrell MI, et al. Germline and Somatic Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes Predict Platinum Response and Survival in Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Carcinomas. Clinical Cancer Research. 2014;20: 764-775.
  22. Kondrashova O, Topp M, Nesic K, et al. Methylation of all BRCA1 copies predicts response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in ovarian carcinoma. Nature Communications. 2018;9: 3970.
  23. Moschetta M, George A, Kaye SB, Banerjee S. BRCA somatic mutations and epigenetic BRCA modifications in serous ovarian cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2016;27: 1449-1455.
  24. Dougherty BA, Lai Z, Hodgson DR, et al. Biological and clinical evidence for somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 as predictive markers for olaparib response in high-grade serous ovarian cancers in the maintenance setting. Oncotarget. 2017;8: 43653-43661.
  25. Konstantinopoulos PA, Spentzos D, Karlan BY, et al. Gene Expression Profile of BRCAness That Correlates With Responsiveness to Chemotherapy and With Outcome in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28: 3555-3561.
  26. Poveda A, Lheureux S, Colombo N, et al. Olaparib maintenance monotherapy for non- germline BRCA1/2-mutated (non-gBRCAm) platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSR OC) patients (pts): Phase IIIb OPINION interim analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2020;38: 6057. (32)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, C. K., Friedlander, M. L., Tjokrowidjaja, A., Ledermann, J. A., Coleman, R. L., Mirza, M. R., Matulonis, U. A., Pujade‐Lauraine, E., Bloomfield, R., Goble, S., Wang, P., Glasspool, R. M., Scott, C. L., & the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Meta‐Analysis Committee
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University College London (GB)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Université Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Clovis Oncology (United States) (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-19
Volume
127
Issue
14
Pages
2432-2441
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W3136213266
Cited by
36
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
PARP inhibitors, maintenance therapy, recurrent ovarian cancer, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, progression-free survival, germline BRCA1 mutation, germline BRCA2 mutation, somatic BRCA mutations, homologous recombination deficiency, olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, predictive biomarkers, treatment response
MeSH terms
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, Progression-Free Survival, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Ovarian Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Maintenance Chemotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review