Molecular and Clinical Predictors of Improvement in Progression‐free Survival with Maintenance PARP Inhibitor Therapy in Women with Platinum‐sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta‐analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The authors performed a meta-analysis to better quantify the benefit of maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy to inform practice in platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade ovarian cancer for patient subsets with the following characteristics: germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm), somatic BRCA mutation (sBRCAm), wild-type BRCA but homologous recombinant-deficient (HRD), homologous recombinant-proficient (HRP), and baseline clinical prognostic characteristics. METHODS: Randomized trials comparing a PARPi versus placebo as maintenance treatment were identified from electronic databases. Treatment estimates of progression-free survival were pooled across trials using the inverse variance weighted method. RESULTS: Four trials included 972 patients who received a PARPi (olaparib, 31%; niraparib, 35%; or rucaparib, 34%) and 530 patients who received placebo. For patients who had germline BRCA1 mutation (gBRCAm1) (N = 471), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.23-0.37); for those who had germline BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm2) (N = 236), the HR was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.17-0.39); and, for those who had sBRCAm (N = 123), the HR was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.12-0.41). The treatment effect was similar between the gBRCAm and sBRCAm subsets (P = .48). In patients who had wild-type BRCA HRD tumors (excluding sBRCAm; N = 309), the HR was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.31-0.56); and, in those who had wild-type BRCA HRP tumors (N = 346), the HR was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.83). The relative treatment effect was greater for the BRCAm versus HRD (P = .03), BRCAm versus HRP (P < .00001), and HRD versus HRP (P < .00001) subsets. There was no difference in benefit based on age, response after recent chemotherapy, and prior bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: In platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade ovarian cancer, maintenance PARPi improves progression-free survival for all patient subsets. PARPi therapy has a similar magnitude of benefit for sBRCAm and gBRCAm. Although patients with BRCAm derive the greatest benefit, the absence of a BRCAm or HRD could not be used to exclude patients from maintenance PARPi therapy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Functional analyses, alongside molecular assays, are required to confirm the predicted response of women with ovarian cancer to PARP inhibitors such as olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib.
“Functional analyses, alongside molecular assays, are required to confirm the predicted response of women with ovarian cancer to PARPis such as the FDA-approved drugs olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib (Dickson et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2021; Valabrega et al., 2021).”
From Three-dimensional modelling of ovarian cancer: from cell lines to organoids for discovery and personalized medicine (2022) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823 · see citing works
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859 · see citing works
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554 · see citing works
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2020) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21590 · Cited by 20,444 · see citing works
Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma
Perou, C. M. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/hvp3-wg08 · Cited by 7,927 · see citing works
Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Mirza, M. R., Monk, B. J., Herrstedt, J., Oza, A. M., Mahner, S., Redondo, A., Fabbro, M., Ledermann, J. A., Lorusso, D., Vergote, I. B., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1611310 · Cited by 2,452 · see citing works
Self-citationOlaparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
Ledermann, J. A., Harter, P., Gourley, C., Friedlander, M. L., Vergote, I. B., Rustin, G. J. S., Scott, C. L., Meier, W., Shapira‐Frommer, R., Safra, T., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1105535 · Cited by 1,891 · see citing works
Self-citationPujade-Lauraine, É., Ledermann, J. A., Selle, F., Gebski, V., Penson, R. T., Oza, A. M., Korach, J., Huzarski, T., Poveda, A. M., Pignata, S., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30469-2 · Cited by 1,856 · see citing works
Self-citationColeman, R. L., Oza, A. M., Lorusso, D., Aghajanian, C. A., Oaknin, A., Dean, A. P., Colombo, N., Weberpals, J. I., Clamp, A. R., Scambia, G., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32440-6 · Cited by 1,699 · see citing works
Self-citationLedermann, J. A., Harter, P., Gourley, C., Friedlander, M. L., Vergote, I. B., Rustin, G. J. S., Scott, C. L., Meier, W., Shapira‐Frommer, R., Safra, T., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70228-1 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
Self-citationBrca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Moynahan, M. E., Chiu, J. W., Koller, B. H., & Jasin, M. (1999) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80202-6 · Cited by 1,245 · see citing works
Alsop, K., Fereday, S., Meldrum, C. J., DeFazio, A., Emmanuel, C., George, J., Dobrovic, A., Birrer, M. J., Webb, P. M., Stewart, C. J. R., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.39.8545 · Cited by 1,179 · see citing works
Self-citationPennington, K. P., Walsh, T., Harrell, M. I., Lee, M. K., Pennil, C. C., Rendi, M. H., Thornton, A., Norquist, B. M., Casadei, S., Nord, A. S., et al. (2013) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2287 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
BRCA2 Is Required for Homology-Directed Repair of Chromosomal Breaks
Moynahan, M. E., Pierce, A. J., & Jasin, M. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00174-5 · Cited by 1,007 · see citing works
Borenstein, M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2013) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0377-7 · Cited by 767 · see citing works
Miller, R. E., Leary, A. F., Scott, C. L., Serra, V., Lord, C. J., Bowtell, D. D. L., Chang, D. K.-F., Garsed, D. W., Jonkers, J., Ledermann, J. A., et al. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2102 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Self-citationKonstantinopoulos, P. A., Spentzos, D., Karlan, B. Y., Taniguchi, T., Fountzilas, E., Francoeur, N. J., Levine, D. A., & Cannistra, S. A. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.5719 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Somatic mutations in the BRCA1 gene in sporadic ovarian tumours
Merajver, S., Pham, T. M., Caduff, R., Chen, M., Poy, E. L., Cooney, K., Weber, B., Collins, F., Johnston, C., & Frank, T. S. (1995) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0495-439 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Hennessy, B. T., Timms, K. M., Carey, M. S., Gutin, A., Meyer, L. A., Flake, D. D., Abkevich, V., Potter, J., Pruss, D., Glenn, P., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.2997 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors: Recent Advances and Future Development
Scott, C. L., Swisher, E. M., & Kaufmann, S. H. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.58.8848 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Self-citationKondrashova, O., Topp, M. D., Nesic, K., Lieschke, E., Ho, G., Harrell, M. I., Zapparoli, G. V., Hadley, A., Hollian, R., Boehm, E., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05564-z · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Self-citationBRCA somatic mutations and epigenetic BRCA modifications in serous ovarian cancer
Moschetta, M., George, A. J., Kaye, S. B., & Banerjee, S. N. (2016) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw142 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Ovarian carcinomas with genetic and epigenetic BRCA1 loss have distinct molecular abnormalities
Press, J. Z., Luca, A. D., Boyd, N., Young, S. S., Troussard, A. A., Ridge, Y., Kaurah, P., Kalloger, S. E., Blood, K. A., Smith, M. J., et al. (2008) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-17 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Candidate biomarkers of PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ovarian cancer beyond the BRCA genes
Hodgson, D., Dougherty, B. A., Lai, Z., Fielding, A., Grinsted, L. M., Spencer, S., O’Connor, M. J., Ho, T. W., Robertson, J. D., Lanchbury, J. S. S., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-018-0274-8 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Self-citationDann, R. B., DeLoia, J. A., Timms, K. M., Zorn, K. K., Potter, J., Flake, D. D., Lanchbury, J. S. S., & Krivak, T. C. (2012) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.006 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Somatic and germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene in sporadic ovarian cancer.
Foster, K. A., Harrington, P. A., Kerr, J., et al. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Poveda, A. M., Floquet, A., Ledermann, J. A., Asher, R., Penson, R. T., Oza, A. M., Korach, J., Huzarski, T., Pignata, S., Friedlander, M. L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.6002 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationDougherty, B. A., Lai, Z., Hodgson, D., Orr, M. C. M., Hawryluk, M. J., Sun, J. X., Yelensky, R., Spencer, S., Robertson, J. D., Ho, T. W., et al. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.17613 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citation435 Candidate biomarkers of PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ovarian cancer beyond the BRCA genes
Hodgson, D., Dougherty, B. A., Lai, Z., Grinsted, L. M., Spencer, S., O’Connor, M. J., Ho, T. W., Robertson, J. D., Lanchbury, J. S. S., Timms, K., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(16)30269-6 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationPoveda, A. M., Lheureux, S., Colombo, N., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.6057 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Bell D, Berchuck A, Birrer M, et al. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474: 609-615.
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2020;70: 7-30.
- Moynahan ME, Chiu JW, Koller BH, Jasin M. Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair. Molecular Cell. 1999;4: 511-518.
- Moynahan ME, Pierce AJ, Jasin M. BRCA2 Is Required for Homology-Directed Repair of Chromosomal Breaks. Molecular Cell. 2001;7: 263-272.
- Press JZ, De Luca A, Boyd N, et al. Ovarian carcinomas with genetic and epigenetic BRCA1 loss have distinct molecular abnormalities. BMC cancer. 2008;8: 17-17.
- The Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Bell D, Berchuck A, et al. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474: 609.
- Scott CL, Swisher EM, Kaufmann SH. Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors: Recent Advances and Future Development. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015;33: 1397-1406.
- Bell D, Berchuck A, Birrer M, et al. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474: 609-615.
- Merajver SD, Pham TM, Caduff RF, et al. Somatic mutations in the BRCA1 gene in sporadic ovarian tumours. Nature Genetics. 1995;9: 439-443.
- Hennessy BTJ, Timms KM, Carey MS, et al. Somatic Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Could Expand the Number of Patients That Benefit From Poly (ADP Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28: 3570-3576.
- Foster KA, Harrington P, Kerr J, et al. Somatic and Germline Mutations of the BRCA2 Gene in Sporadic Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Research. 1996;56: 3622-3625.
- Dann RB, DeLoia JA, Timms KM, et al. BRCA1/2 mutations and expression: Response to platinum chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012;125: 677-682.
- Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, et al. BRCA Mutation Frequency and Patterns of Treatment Response in BRCA Mutation-Positive Women With Ovarian Cancer: A Report From the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30: 2654-2663.
- Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J, et al. Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum- Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375: 2154-2164.
- Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C, et al. Olaparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum- Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366: 1382-1392.
- Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C, et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2014;15: 852- 861.
- Coleman RL, Oza AM, Lorusso D, et al. Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2017;390: 1949-1961.
- Pujade-Lauraine E, Ledermann JA, Selle F, et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2017;18: 1274-1284.
- Borenstein M, Higgins JP. Meta-analysis and subgroups. Prev Sci. 2013;14: 134-143.
- Miller RE, Leary A, Scott CL, et al. ESMO recommendations on predictive biomarker testing for homologous recombination deficiency and PARP inhibitor benefit in ovarian cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2020;31: 1606-1622.
- Pennington KP, Walsh T, Harrell MI, et al. Germline and Somatic Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes Predict Platinum Response and Survival in Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Carcinomas. Clinical Cancer Research. 2014;20: 764-775.
- Kondrashova O, Topp M, Nesic K, et al. Methylation of all BRCA1 copies predicts response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in ovarian carcinoma. Nature Communications. 2018;9: 3970.
- Moschetta M, George A, Kaye SB, Banerjee S. BRCA somatic mutations and epigenetic BRCA modifications in serous ovarian cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2016;27: 1449-1455.
- Dougherty BA, Lai Z, Hodgson DR, et al. Biological and clinical evidence for somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 as predictive markers for olaparib response in high-grade serous ovarian cancers in the maintenance setting. Oncotarget. 2017;8: 43653-43661.
- Konstantinopoulos PA, Spentzos D, Karlan BY, et al. Gene Expression Profile of BRCAness That Correlates With Responsiveness to Chemotherapy and With Outcome in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28: 3555-3561.
- Poveda A, Lheureux S, Colombo N, et al. Olaparib maintenance monotherapy for non- germline BRCA1/2-mutated (non-gBRCAm) platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSR OC) patients (pts): Phase IIIb OPINION interim analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2020;38: 6057. (32)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yee, C., Dickson, K.-A., Muntasir, M. N., Ma, Y., & Marsh, D. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.836984 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, C. K., Friedlander, M. L., Tjokrowidjaja, A., Ledermann, J. A., Coleman, R. L., Mirza, M. R., Matulonis, U. A., Pujade‐Lauraine, E., Bloomfield, R., Goble, S., Wang, P., Glasspool, R. M., Scott, C. L., & the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Meta‐Analysis Committee
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University College London (GB)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Université Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Clovis Oncology (United States) (US)
- GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
- National Health Service (GB)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-03-19
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2432-2441
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W3136213266
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- discovery.ucl.ac.uk
- Locations
- Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Keywords
- PARP inhibitors, maintenance therapy, recurrent ovarian cancer, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, progression-free survival, germline BRCA1 mutation, germline BRCA2 mutation, somatic BRCA mutations, homologous recombination deficiency, olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, predictive biomarkers, treatment response
- MeSH terms
- Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, Progression-Free Survival, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Ovarian Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Maintenance Chemotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review