The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Peptidomics of CNS‐associated neurohemal systems of adult Drosophila melanogaster: A mass spectrometric survey of peptides from individual flies
Abstract
Neuropeptides are important messenger molecules that influence nearly all physiological processes. In insects, they can be released as neuromodulators within the central nervous system (CNS) or as neurohormones into the hemolymph. We analyzed the peptidome of neurohormonal release sites and associated secretory peptidergic neurons of adult Drosophila melanogaster. MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometric analyzes were performed on single organs or cell cluster from individual flies. This first peptidomic characterization in adult fruit flies revealed 32 different neuropeptides. Peptides not directly predictable from previously cloned or annotated precursor genes were sequenced by tandem mass spectrometry. These peptides turned out to be either intermediate products of neuropeptide processing or shorter versions of known peptides. We found that the peptidome of the CNS‐associated neurohemal organs is tagma‐specific in Drosophila. Abdominal neurohemal organs and their supplying peptidergic neurons contain the capa gene products periviscerokinins and pyrokinin‐1, thoracic neurohemal organs contain FMRFamides, and the neurohemal release sites of the brain contain pyrokinin‐1 2‐15, pyrokinin‐2, corazonin, myosuppressin, and sNPF as their major putative release products. Our results show that peptidomic approaches are well suited to study differential neuropeptide expression or posttranslational modifications in morphologically defined parts of the nervous system and in a developmental and physiological context in animals as small as Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Neurol. 474:379–392, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances in neuropeptide signaling in Drosophila, from genes to physiology and behavior
Nässel, D. R., & Zandawala, M. (2019) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.003 · Cited by 355
Multiple neuropeptides in the Drosophila antennal lobe suggest complex modulatory circuits
Carlsson, M. A., Diesner, M., Schachtner, J., & Nässel, D. R. (2010) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.22405 · Cited by 146
Nässel, D. R. (2009) · Invertebrate Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10158-009-0090-1 · Cited by 125
Johard, H. A. D., Enell, L. E., Gustafsson, E., Trifilieff, P., Veenstra, J. A., & Nässel, D. R. (2008) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.21636 · Cited by 120
Rhea, J. M., Wegener, C., & Bender, M. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000967 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Predel, R., Wegener, C., Russell, W. K., Tichy, S. E., Russell, D. H., & Nachman, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-26
- Volume
- 474
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 379-392
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1975894526
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peptidomics of CNS‐associated neurohemal systems of adult Drosophila melanogaster: A mass spectrometric survey of peptides from individual flies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.20145
- The paper
- Predel, R., Wegener, C., Russell, W. K., Tichy, S. E., Russell, D. H., & Nachman, R. J. (2004). Peptidomics of CNS‐associated neurohemal systems of adult Drosophila melanogaster: A mass spectrometric survey of peptides from individual flies. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.