Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Peptidomics of CNS‐associated neurohemal systems of adult Drosophila melanogaster: A mass spectrometric survey of peptides from individual flies

Predel, Reinhard, Wegener, Christian, Russell, William K., Tichy, Shane E., Russell, David H., Nachman, Ronald J.·2004·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Neuropeptides are important messenger molecules that influence nearly all physiological processes. In insects, they can be released as neuromodulators within the central nervous system (CNS) or as neurohormones into the hemolymph. We analyzed the peptidome of neurohormonal release sites and associated secretory peptidergic neurons of adult Drosophila melanogaster. MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometric analyzes were performed on single organs or cell cluster from individual flies. This first peptidomic characterization in adult fruit flies revealed 32 different neuropeptides. Peptides not directly predictable from previously cloned or annotated precursor genes were sequenced by tandem mass spectrometry. These peptides turned out to be either intermediate products of neuropeptide processing or shorter versions of known peptides. We found that the peptidome of the CNS‐associated neurohemal organs is tagma‐specific in Drosophila. Abdominal neurohemal organs and their supplying peptidergic neurons contain the capa gene products periviscerokinins and pyrokinin‐1, thoracic neurohemal organs contain FMRFamides, and the neurohemal release sites of the brain contain pyrokinin‐1 2‐15, pyrokinin‐2, corazonin, myosuppressin, and sNPF as their major putative release products. Our results show that peptidomic approaches are well suited to study differential neuropeptide expression or posttranslational modifications in morphologically defined parts of the nervous system and in a developmental and physiological context in animals as small as Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Neurol. 474:379–392, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.20145

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Predel, R., Wegener, C., Russell, W. K., Tichy, S. E., Russell, D. H., & Nachman, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-26
Volume
474
Issue
3
Pages
379-392
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1975894526
Cited by
171
References
0
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peptidomics of CNS‐associated neurohemal systems of adult Drosophila melanogaster: A mass spectrometric survey of peptides from individual flies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.20145
The paper
Predel, R., Wegener, C., Russell, W. K., Tichy, S. E., Russell, D. H., & Nachman, R. J. (2004). Peptidomics of CNS‐associated neurohemal systems of adult Drosophila melanogaster: A mass spectrometric survey of peptides from individual flies. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20145

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.