The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive
Open accessAbstract
This article presents a three‐factor anatomical model of human idea generation and creative drive, focusing on interactions between the temporal lobes, frontal lobes, and limbic system. Evidence is drawn from functional imaging, drug studies, and lesion analysis. Temporal lobe changes, as in hypergraphia, often increase idea generation, sometimes at the expense of quality. Frontal lobe deficits may decrease idea generation, in part because of rigid judgments about an idea's worth. These phenomena are clearest in verbal creativity, and roughly parallel the pressured communication of temporal lobe epilepsy, mania, and Wernicke's aphasia—compared to the sparse speech and cognitive inflexibility of depression, Broca's aphasia, and other frontal lobe lesions. The phenomena also shape non‐linguistic creativity, as in that of frontotemporal dementia. The appropriate balance between frontal and temporal activity is mediated by mutually inhibitory corticocortical interactions. Mesolimbic dopamine influences novelty seeking and creative drive. Dopamine agonists and antagonists have opposite effects on goal‐directed behavior and hallucinations. Creative drive is not identical to skill—the latter depends more on neocortical association areas. However, drive correlates better with successful creative output than skill does. Traditional neuroscientific models of creativity, such as the left brain – right brain hemispheric model, emphasize skills primarily, and stress art and musical skill at the expense of language and mathematics. The three‐factor model proposed here predicts findings in a broad range of normal and pathological states and can be tested in many experimental paradigms. J. Comp. Neurol. 493:147–153, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guilford, J. P. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0063487 · Cited by 3,588
THE BASAL GANGLIA: FOCUSED SELECTION AND INHIBITION OF COMPETING MOTOR PROGRAMS
MINK, J. W. (1996) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(96)00042-1 · Cited by 2,486
Manic-Depressive Insanity and Paranoia.
(1921) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1921.02630330070026 · Cited by 1,573
Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses
Breiter, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A., & Shizgal, P. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00303-8 · Cited by 1,404
Manic Depressive Insanity and Paranoia
Kraepelin, E. (1921) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-192104000-00057 · Cited by 1,314
Jakobson, R., & Halle, M. (1980) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110889611 · Cited by 1,269
Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value
Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O'Connor, E., & Breiter, H. C. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00491-3 · Cited by 1,087
Goldapple, K., Segal, Z., Garson, C., Lau, M., Bieling, P., Kennedy, S., & Mayberg, H. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.1.34 · Cited by 1,068
Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4 · Cited by 1,023
Creativity and mental illness: prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives
(1987) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.144.10.1288 · Cited by 770
Cited by
De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739 · Cited by 1,045
The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463281003765323 · Cited by 1,044
To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021 · Cited by 407
The structure of creative cognition in the human brain
Jung, R. E. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00330 · Cited by 391
Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study
Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Gebauer, D., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., & Ebner, F. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.072 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Flaherty, A. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-27
- Volume
- 493
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-153
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2109573812
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.20768
- The paper
- Flaherty, A. W. (2005). Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20768
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.