Cited by 115Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Chemical neuroanatomy of the Drosophila central complex: Distribution of multiple neuropeptides in relation to neurotransmitters

Kahsai, Lily, Winther, Åsa M.E.·2011·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The central complex of the insect brain is an integration center, receiving inputs from many parts of the brain. In Drosophila it has been associated with the control of both locomotor and visually correlated behaviors. The central complex can be divided into several substructures and is comprised of a large number of neuronal types. These neurons produce classical neurotransmitters, biogenic amines, and different neuropeptides. However, the distribution of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in central‐complex circuits of Drosophila is poorly known. By immunolabeling and GAL4‐directed expression of marker proteins, we analyzed the distribution of acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, monoamines, and eight different neuropeptides; Drosophila tachykinin, short neuropeptide F, myoinhibitory peptide, allatostatin A, proctolin, SIFamide, neuropeptide F, and FMRFamide. All eight neuropeptides were localized to the fan‐shaped body, the largest substructure of the central complex, and were mapped to different layers within this structure. Several populations of peptide‐immunoreactive tangential and columnar neurons were identified, of which some colocalized acetylcholine. Fewer peptides were found to be expressed in the other substructures: the ellipsoid body, the protocerebral bridge, and the noduli. The ellipsoid body and the protocerebral bridge were innervated by extrinsic peptide expressing neurons. Our findings reveal that numerous neuropeptides are expressed in the central complex and that each peptide has a distinct distribution pattern, suggesting important roles for neuropeptides as neuromediators and cotransmitters in this brain area. J. Comp. Neurol. 519:290‐315, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.22520

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahsai, L., & Winther, Å. M. E.
Affiliations
Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Winther, Åsa M.E.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-16
Volume
519
Issue
2
Pages
290-315
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1985282761
Cited by
115
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Oxford
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
neuropeptides, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, monoamines, tachykinins, short neuropeptide F, myoinhibitory peptides, allatostatin A, proctolin, SIFamide, neuropeptide F, FMRFamide, fan-shaped body, ellipsoid body, protocerebral bridge, co-transmission, insect brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Immunohistochemistry, Neurons, Neuropeptides, Biomarkers, Neurotransmitter Agents, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review