Cited by 54Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFish biology, ecology, and behavior

Organization of the gymnotiform fish pallium in relation to learning and memory: IV. Expression of conserved transcription factors and implications for the evolution of dorsal telencephalon

Harvey‐Girard, Erik, Giassi, Ana C.C., Ellis, William, Maler, Leonard·2012·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

We have cloned the apteronotid homologs of FoxP2, Otx1, and FoxO3. There was, in the case of all three genes, good similarity between the apteronotid and human amino acid sequences: FoxP2, 78%; Otx1, 54%; FoxO3, 71%. The functional domains of these genes were conserved to a far greater extent, on average: FoxP2, 89%; Otx1, 76%; FoxO3, 82%. This led us to hypothesize that the cellular functions of these genes might also be conserved. We used in situ hybridization to examine the distribution of the mRNA transcripts of these genes in the apteronotid telencephalon. We confined our analysis to the pallial regions previously associated with learning about social signals, whose circuitry has been closely examined in the other articles of this series. We found that AptFoxP2 and AptOtx1 transcripts were expressed predominantly in the dorsocentral division of the pallium (DC); the dorsolateral division of the pallium (DL) contained only weakly labeled neurons. In both cases, the distribution of labeled neurons was very heterogeneous, and unlabeled neurons could be found adjacent to strongly labeled ones. In contrast, we found that most neurons in DL strongly expressed AptFoxO3 mRNA, although there was only weak expression in a small number of cells within DC. We briefly discuss the relevance of our results regarding the functional roles of AptFoxP2/AptOtx1‐expressing neurons in DC for communication vs. foraging behavior. We extensively discuss the implications of our results for possible homologies between DL and DC and medial and dorsal pallium of tetrapods, respectively. J. Comp. Neurol. 520:3395–3413, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.23107

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presumed homologue of the hippocampus in teleost fish shares a comparable topological position within the pallium and a number of developmental, neuroanatomical, connectivity, and histochemical similarities with the hippocampus.

    “The presumed homologue of the hippocampus in teleost fish shares not only a comparable topological position within the pallium, but also a number of developmental, neuroanatomical, connectivity, and histochemical similarities.”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [175]

  • The teleost fish hippocampus homologue is profusely interconnected with primary and association sensory pallial areas, from which it receives highly processed sensory information required to construct map-like spatial memories and for allocentric navigation.

    “Finally, like the hippocampus of mammals and other tetrapods, the teleost fish hippocampus homologue is profusely interconnected with these primary and association sensory pallial areas [164,175,199] from which it seems to receive highly processed sensory information required to construct map-like spatial memories and for allocentric navigation [175,183].”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [175]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey‐Girard, E., Giassi, A. C. C., Ellis, W., & Maler, L.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Harvey‐Girard, Erik
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-16
Volume
520
Issue
15
Pages
3395-3413
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1975928668
Cited by
54
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (57084)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
Keywords
FOXP2, Otx1, FOXO3, transcription factors, social learning, memory
MeSH terms
Forkhead Box Protein O3, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Learning, Male, Memory, Neurons, Phylogeny, RNA, Messenger, Telencephalon, Transcription Factors, Antisense Elements (Genetics), Conserved Sequence, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Evolution, Molecular, Gymnotiformes, Xenopus Proteins, Zebrafish Proteins, Otx Transcription Factors, Forkhead Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review