The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential LRRK2 expression in the cortex, striatum, and substantia nigra in transgenic and nontransgenic rodents
Abstract
Mutations in leucine‐rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are found in a significant proportion of late‐onset Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Elucidating the neuroanatomical localization of LRRK2 will further define LRRK2 function and the molecular basis of PD. Here, we utilize recently characterized monoclonal antibodies to evaluate LRRK2 expression in rodent brain regions relevant to PD. In both mice and rats, LRRK2 is highly expressed in the cortex and striatum, particularly in pyramidal neurons of layer V and in medium spiny neurons within striosomes. Overall, rats have a more restricted distribution of LRRK2 compared with mice. Mice, but not rats, show high levels of LRRK2 expression in the substantia nigra pars compacta. Expression of the pathogenic LRRK2‐G2019S protein from mouse bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) constructs closely mimics endogenous LRRK2 distribution in the mouse brain. However, LRRK2‐G2019S expression derived from human BAC constructs causes LRRK2 to be expressed in additional neuron subtypes in the rat such as striatal cholinergic interneurons and the substantia nigra pars compacta. The distribution of LRRK2 from human BAC constructs more closely resembles descriptions of LRRK2 in humans and nonhuman primates. Computational analyses of DNA regulatory elements in LRRK2 show a primate‐specific promoter sequence that does not exist in lower mammalian species. These noncoding regions may be involved in directing neuronal expression patterns. Together, these studies will aid in understanding the normal function of LRRK2 in the brain and will assist in model selection for future studies. J. Comp. Neurol. 522:2465–2480, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LRRK2 is expressed in the cortex, substantia nigra pars compacta, and striatum of the rodent brain, particularly in layer V pyramidal neurons in the cortex and spiny projection neurons in the striatum.
“A previous study by our group showed that LRRK2 is expressed in the cortex, SNc, and in the striatum of the rodent brain particularly in layer V pyramidal neurons in the cortex, and spiny projection neurons in the striatum [73, 90].”
From Cellular and subcellular localization of Rab10 and phospho-T73 Rab10 in the mouse and human brain (2023) · cites this paper as [90]
The Results sections on rodent motor cortex and striatum identify LRRK2 in layer V pyramidal neurons and medium spiny neurons, respectively. The Results section on the rodent SNpc reports expression in mice but no detectable LRRK2 in the examined rat dopaminergic neurons, so the unqualified statement about the rodent SNc misses a species distinction. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLRRK2 is highly expressed in the striatum.
“Immunofluorescence of pRab10 was quantified in the striatum because LRRK2 is highly expressed in this brain region [90].”
From Cellular and subcellular localization of Rab10 and phospho-T73 Rab10 in the mouse and human brain (2023) · cites this paper as [90]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes
Gong, S., Zheng, C., Doughty, M. L., Losos, K., Didkovsky, N., Schambra, U. B., Nowak, N. J., Joyner, A., Leblanc, G., Hatten, M. E., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02033 · Cited by 2,108
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90817-4 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST20120124 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.21019 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00065-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.926603 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.49.6.1570 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrn2935 · DOI
- 10.1093/hmg/dds057 · DOI
- 10.1042/BJ20121742 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.64.1.20 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.10279 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.20808 · DOI
- 10.1038/311461a0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.2799392 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.20791 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0063778 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0036581 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.034 · DOI
- 10.1186/1750-1326-7-25 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5996-09.2010 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.23659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0304-3940(94)11192-L · DOI
- 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a009324 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5604-09.2010 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn.2349 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.903200304 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.07.017 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msl114 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.01.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.05.027 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5601-11.2012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nn.3350 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70175-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04616.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mds.21114 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03919.x · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19961125)375:4<659::AID-CNE7>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0306-4522(97)00253-4 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0507360102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.12.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.005 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rodent models in neuroscience research: is it a rat race?
Ellenbroek, B., & Youn, J. (2016) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.026120 · Cited by 627
Dhekne, H. S., Yanatori, I., Gomez, R. C., Tonelli, F., Diez, F., Schüle, B., Steger, M., Alessi, D. R., & Pfeffer, S. R. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.40202 · Cited by 240
Abrogation of α-synuclein–mediated dopaminergic neurodegeneration in LRRK2-deficient rats
Daher, J. P. L., Volpicelli-Daley, L. A., Blackburn, J. P., Moehle, M. S., & West, A. B. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1403215111 · Cited by 223
Self-citationThe complex relationships between microglia, alpha-synuclein, and LRRK2 in Parkinson's disease
Schapansky, J., Nardozzi, J. D., & LaVoie, M. J. (2015) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.049 · Cited by 132
Khan, S. S., Sobu, Y., Dhekne, H. S., Tonelli, F., Berndsen, K., Alessi, D. R., & Pfeffer, S. R. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.67900 · Cited by 93
Lrrk2 alleles modulate inflammation during microbial infection of mice in a sex-dependent manner
Shutinoski, B., Hakimi, M., Harmsen, I. E., Lunn, M., Rocha, J., Lengacher, N., Zhou, Y. Y., Khan, J., Nguyen, A., Hake-Volling, Q., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aas9292 · Cited by 96
Association of a common genetic variant with Parkinson’s disease is mediated by microglia
Langston, R. G., Beilina, A., Reed, X., Kaganovich, A., Singleton, A. B., Blauwendraat, C., Gibbs, J. R., & Cookson, M. R. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abp8869 · Cited by 93
Cellular and subcellular localization of Rab10 and phospho-T73 Rab10 in the mouse and human brain
Singh, V., Menard, M. A., Serrano, G. E., Beach, T. G., Zhao, H. T., Riley-DiPaolo, A., Subrahmanian, N., LaVoie, M. J., & Volpicelli-Daley, L. A. (2023) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-023-01704-9 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- West, A. B., Cowell, R. M., Daher, J. P. L., Moehle, M. S., Hinkle, K. M., Melrose, H. L., Standaert, D. G., & Volpicelli‐Daley, L. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-12
- Volume
- 522
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2465-2480
- ISSN
- 0021-9967
- 1096-9861
- PMC
- PMC4076169
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review