The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional organization in the superior colliculus of the golden hamster
Abstract
The superior colliculus of the golden hamster was investigated by means of multi‐unit and single unit recording. The retinotopic map, which probably embraces a projection from the entire retina of the contralateral eye, is organized as in other vertebrates, with the central field represented in the anterior colliculus, the upper field medially. Magnification factor is fairly uniform and is about 0.02 mm/deg. There is a small binocular segment (where almost half of all neurones have input from the ipsilateral eye) in the anterior colliculus, representing the area of field around the area centralis and the anterior pole of the field. In the more superficial layers, units have small (about 10 deg diameter) receptive fields, which can be classified as symmetrical, responding to slow movement (80%) very fast movement detectors (6%) directional movement detectors (13%) and axial movement detectors (%) In the deeper layers, below the stratum opticum, receptive field size increases dramatically and many cells habituate rapidly, making them sensitive only to new events. Receptive fields can be classified as movement detectors (89%) directional movement detectors (10%) and axial movement detectors (2%). All directional receptive fields, at least in the upper visual field, have an upward component in their directional preferences. About 42% of deeper layer cells have somatic sensory input, responding to light touch on the fur or whiskers of the contralateral half of the body. Some 5% of cells respond to complex sounds on the contralateral side of the animal. Many of these somatic and auditory cells also have visual receptive fields and, throughout the colliculus, there is general correspondence between the maps of visual space, auditory space and the body surface. This correlation may be important in the regulation of orienting behaviour towards novel peripheral stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Cited by
Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1986) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1986.56.3.640 · Cited by 1,183
Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting
Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1997) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206843 · Cited by 475
King, A. J., & Palmer, A. R. (1985) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00236934 · Cited by 353
Roots of a social brain: Developmental models of emerging animacy-detection mechanisms
Rosa Salva, O., Mayer, U., & Vallortigara, G. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.015 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Y‐C, T., & Blakemore, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-08-15
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 483-503
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2131946051
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional organization in the superior colliculus of the golden hamster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901680404
- The paper
- Y‐C, T., & Blakemore, C. (1976). Functional organization in the superior colliculus of the golden hamster. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901680404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.