Cited by 360Visual perception and processing mechanismsRetinal Development and DisordersGlaucoma and retinal disorders

Origins of crossed and uncrossed retinal projections in pigmented and albino mice

Dräger, Ursula C., Olsen, John F.·1980·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The extent of the binocular cortical field in albino mice, as revealed by recording from single cells, was almost normal; although the input from the ipsilateral eye was weaker than normal, most cells were driven from both eyes. By backfilling retinal ganglion cells from one optic tract with horseradish peroxidase we examined the origins of the retinofugal projections. Filled cells ipsilateral to the injected tract were concentrated in a crescent-shaped area bordering the inferior temperal retina. In black mice this area constituted 20% of the total retinal area, in albinos 17%. In black mice we counted nearly 1,000 labeled cells in the ipsilateral retina, or 2.6% of all cells filled in both eyes. Albinos had about one-third fewer filled cells ipsilaterally than black mice. Four percent of all ipsilaterally filled cells in black mice and 8% in albinos were scattered outside of the crescent region. The density of ipsilaterally projecting cells was uniform throughout the crescent region in black mice, but decreased toward the central retina in albinos. In retinas contralateral to the injection up to 39,000 cells were filled-about two-thirds of the cells in the ganglion-cell layer whose cytoplasm contained conspicuous Nissl substance. Depending on classification of unfilled cells as ganglion cells or interneurons, we estimated a total of 48,000 to 65,000 ganglion cells to exist in the retina. The size distribution of ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells was similar in albinos…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901910306

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dräger, U. C., & Olsen, J. F.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-06
Volume
191
Issue
3
Pages
383-412
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2103788456
Cited by
360
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2p30ey001995-09)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY001938)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
retinofugal projections, albino mice, retinal ganglion cells, optic tract, retinal ganglion cell density, cell size distribution
MeSH terms
Animals, Dominance, Cerebral, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Optic Nerve, Retina, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review