The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tonotopic organization in auditory cortex of the cat
Abstract
Microelectrode mapping techniques were employed in the cat's auditory cortex to relate the best frequencies of a large population of neurons with their spatial loci. Based upon the best‐frequency distribution, the auditory region was divided into four complete and orderly tonotopic representations and a surrounding belt of cortex in which the tonotopic organization was more complex. The four auditory fields occupy a crescent‐shaped band of tissue which comprises portions of both the exposed gyral surfaces and sulcal banks of the ectosylvian cortex. The anterior auditory field (A) is situated most rostrally upon the anterior ectosylvian gyrus. It extends upon the ventral bank of the suprasylvian sulcus and upon the banks of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus. Adjoining field A caudally is the primary auditory field (AI), which extends across the middle ectosylvian gyrus and portions of both banks of the posterior ectosylvian sulcus. The representations of the highest best frequencies in fields A and AI are contiguous. Caudal and ventral to AI are located the posterior (P) and ventroposterior (VP) auditory fields. They lie mainly upon the caudal bank of the posterior ectosylvian sulcus but also extend upon the rostral bank and upon the posterior ectosylvian gyrus. The low best‐frequency representations of fields AI and P are contiguous, whereas the low best‐frequency representation of field VP lies near the ventral end of the posterior ectosylvian sulcus. Fields P and VP are joined along their middle and high best‐frequency representations. Within each auditory field isofrequency lines defined by the spatial loci of neurons with similar best frequencies are oriented orthogonal to the low‐to‐high best‐frequency gradients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps
Kohonen, T. (1982) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00337288 · Cited by 9,529
Kohonen, T. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58325 · Cited by 8,414
Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex
Rauschecker, J. P. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93948-w · Cited by 590
Multiparametric Auditory Receptive Field Organization Across Five Cortical Fields in the Albino Rat
Polley, D. B., Read, H. L., Storace, D. A., & Merzenich, M. M. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01298.2006 · Cited by 339
Plasticity of auditory cortex associated with sensorineural hearing loss in adult C57BL/6J mice
Willott, J. F., Aitkin, L. M., & McFadden, S. L. (1993) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903290310 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Reale, R. A., & Imig, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-07-15
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-291
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1993050927
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tonotopic organization in auditory cortex of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901920207
- The paper
- Reale, R. A., & Imig, T. J. (1980). Tonotopic organization in auditory cortex of the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901920207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.