The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiparametric Auditory Receptive Field Organization Across Five Cortical Fields in the Albino Rat
Abstract
The auditory cortex of the rat is becoming an increasingly popular model system for studies of experience-dependent receptive field plasticity. However, the relative position of various fields within the auditory core and the receptive field organization within each field have yet to be fully described in the normative case. In this study, the macro- and micro-organizational features of the auditory cortex were studied in pentobarbital-anesthetized adult rats with a combination of physiological and anatomical methods. Dense microelectrode mapping procedures were used to identify the relative position of five tonotopically organized fields within the auditory core: primary auditory cortex (AI), the posterior auditory field (PAF), the anterior auditory field (AAF), the ventral auditory field (VAF), and the suprarhinal auditory field (SRAF). AI and AAF both featured short-latency, sharply tuned responses with predominantly monotonic intensity-response functions. SRAF and PAF were both characterized by longer-latency, broadly tuned responses. VAF directly abutted the ventral boundary of AI but was almost exclusively composed of low-threshold nonmonotonic intensity-tuned responses. Dual injection of retrograde tracers into AI and VAF was used to demonstrate that the sources of thalamic input from the medial geniculate body to each area were essentially nonoverlapping. An analysis of receptive field parameters beyond characteristic frequency revealed independent spatially ordered representations for features related to spectral tuning, intensity tuning, and onset response properties in AI, AAF, VAF, and SRAF. These data demonstrate that despite its greatly reduced physical scale, the rat auditory cortex features a surprising degree of organizational complexity and detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex
Wehr, M., & Zador, A. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02116 · Cited by 1,372
Grinvald, A., Lieke, E., Frostig, R., & Hildesheim, R. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-05-02545.1994 · Cited by 632
Cortical remodelling induced by activity of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons
Bao, S., Chan, V. T., & Merzenich, M. M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083586 · Cited by 569
Self-citationPerceptual Learning Directs Auditory Cortical Map Reorganization through Top-Down Influences
Polley, D. B., Steinberg, E. E., & Merzenich, M. M. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3771-05.2006 · Cited by 551
Self-citationTonotopic organization in auditory cortex of the cat
Reale, R. A., & Imig, T. J. (1980) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901920207 · Cited by 545
Tonotopic organization, architectonic fields, and connections of auditory cortex in macaque monkeys
Morel, A., Garraghty, P. E., & Kaas, J. H. (1993) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903350312 · Cited by 520
Romanski, L. M., & LeDoux, J. E. (1993) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/3.6.515 · Cited by 397
Topography and synaptic shaping of direction selectivity in primary auditory cortex
Zhang, L. I., Tan, A. Y. Y., Schreiner, C. E., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01796 · Cited by 377
Self-citationAuditory sensitivity of the albino rat.
Kelly, J. B., & Masterton, B. (1977) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077356 · Cited by 351
Andersen, R. A., Knight, P. L., & Merzenich, M. M. (1980) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901940312 · Cited by 332
Self-citation
Cited by
Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis
Auerbach, B. D., Rodrigues, P. V., & Salvi, R. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00206 · Cited by 439
Neurons along the auditory pathway exhibit a hierarchical organization of prediction error
Parras, G. G., Nieto-Diego, J., Carbajal, G. V., Valdés-Baizabal, C., Escera, C., & Malmierca, M. S. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02038-6 · Cited by 344
Linking topography to tonotopy in the mouse auditory thalamocortical circuit
Hackett, T. A., Rinaldi Barkat, T., O'Brien, B. M. J., Hensch, T. K., & Polley, D. B. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5333-10.2011 · Cited by 216
Self-citationMultiscale optical Ca2+ imaging of tonal organization in mouse auditory cortex
Issa, J. B., Haeffele, B. D., Agarwal, A., Bergles, D. E., Young, E. D., & Yue, D. T. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.009 · Cited by 188
Current Source Density Profiles of Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in Rat Auditory Cortex
Szymanski, F. D., Garcia-Lazaro, J. A., & Schnupp, J. W. H. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00240.2009 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Polley, D. B., Read, H. L., Storace, D. A., & Merzenich, M. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3621-3638
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2141389153
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiparametric Auditory Receptive Field Organization Across Five Cortical Fields in the Albino Rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.01298.2006
- The paper
- Polley, D. B., Read, H. L., Storace, D. A., & Merzenich, M. M. (2007). Multiparametric Auditory Receptive Field Organization Across Five Cortical Fields in the Albino Rat. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01298.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.