The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Golgi study of rat neostriatal neurons: Light microscopic analysis
Abstract
At least two types of large neurons (somatic cross‐sectional areas, SA > 300 μm 2) and five types of medium neurons (SA between 100 and 300 μm 2) were distinguished in Golgi preparations of the adult rat neostriatum. Type I large cells had aspinous somata with long, radiating, sparsely spined dendrites which were sometimes varicose distally, whereas type II large cells had spines on both somatic and dendritic surfaces. Type I medium cells had aspinous somata and proximal dendrites, but their distal dendrites were densely covered with spines. Type II medium cells had somatic spines, and their radiating dendrites were sparsely spined. Other medium cells had no somatic spines: Type III cells had poorly branched and sparsely spined dendrites. Type IV cells had profusely branched, sparsely spined dendrites. Type V cells had radiating and varicose dendrites which could also be sparsely spined. Several small neurons (SA mostly less than 100 μm 2) were also found in the rat neostriatum: Some had aspinous soma with sparsely spined dendrites; others had somatic spines. Except for the type II large cells, intrinsic axon collaterals were observed for every type of neuron, indicating that they all had local integrating functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1991) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62678-3 · Cited by 1,961
Cholinergic systems in mammalian brain and spinal cord
WOOLF, N. (1991) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(91)90006-m · Cited by 948
Dopaminergic modulation of neuronal excitability in the striatum and nucleus accumbens
Nicola, S. M., Surmeier, D. J., & Malenka, R. C. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.185 · Cited by 931
Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements?
Gandevia, S. C., & Burke, D. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0007254x · Cited by 359
Mechanisms of Inhibition within the Telencephalon: “Where the Wild Things Are”
Fishell, G., & Rudy, B. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113717 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, H. T., Wilson, C. J., & Kitai, S. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-06-20
- Volume
- 208
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-126
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1966001039
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Golgi study of rat neostriatal neurons: Light microscopic analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902080202
- The paper
- Chang, H. T., Wilson, C. J., & Kitai, S. T. (1982). A Golgi study of rat neostriatal neurons: Light microscopic analysis. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902080202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.