Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 847

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Glutamate‐ and GABA‐containing neurons in the mouse and rat brain, as demonstrated with a new immunocytochemical technique

Ottersen, Ole P., Storm‐Mathisen, Jon·1984·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Antisera were raised against γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) or glutamate (Glu) conjugated to bovine serum albumin with glutaraldehyde. After purification, these antisera reacted strongly with fixed GABA or Glu, but not significantly with other amino acids fixed with glutaraldehyde to brain macromolecules. The antisera were used to demonstrate the distributions of Glu‐like and GABA‐like immunoreactivities (Glu‐LI and GABA‐LI) in parts of the perfusion‐fixed mouse and rat brain, including the olfactory bulb, cerebral neocortex, thalamus, basal ganglia, lower brain stem, and cerebellum. The level of GABA‐LI varied widely among brain regions, thus it was very high in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra and low in the bulk of the thalamus. The GABA antisera labeled nonpyramidal neurons of the neocortex, most cells of the reticular nucleus of the thalamus, medium‐sized cells of the caudatoputamen, and stellate, basket, Golgi, and Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. The distribution of GABA‐LI closely matched that of the GABA‐synthesizing enzyme, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), as revealed in immunocytochemical studies by others. However, the GABA antisera seem to be better suited than GAD antisera for demonstrating putative GABA‐ergic axons. The results suggest that GABA‐LI, as displayed by the present method, is a good marker of neurons thought to use GABA as a transmitter. Glutamate‐like immunoreactivity was much more evenly distributed among regions than GABA‐LI, but was particularly low in globus pallidus and substantia nigra and high in the cerebral cortex. Mitral cells of the olfactory bulb, pyramidal neocortical cells, and other cells assumed to use Glu or aspartate as transmitter were stained for Glu‐LI, but so also were neurons that are thought to use other transmitters, such as cells in the substantia nigra pars compacta, in the dorsal raphe nucleus, and in the brain stem motor nuclei. The Glu antisera seem to reveal the “transmitter pool” as well as the “metabolic pool” of Glu in perfusion‐fixed material. This report shows that it is possible by means of immunocytochemistry to display reliably the tissue contents of GABA and Glu in material that has been fixed by perfusion with glutaraldehyde.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902290308

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 847

Metadata

Authors
Ottersen, O. P., & Storm‐Mathisen, J.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-11
Volume
229
Issue
3
Pages
374-392
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1971866692
Cited by
847
References
0
FWCI
14.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glutamate‐ and GABA‐containing neurons in the mouse and rat brain, as demonstrated with a new immunocytochemical technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902290308
The paper
Ottersen, O. P., & Storm‐Mathisen, J. (1984). Glutamate‐ and GABA‐containing neurons in the mouse and rat brain, as demonstrated with a new immunocytochemical technique. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902290308

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.