Cited by 284Retinal Development and DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Cholinergic amacrine cells in the rat retina

Voigt, Thomas·1986·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Staining of rat retinal wholemounts with a monoclonal antibody against choline-acetyl-transferase (ChAT) reveals two matching populations of amacrine cells in pigmented and albino rat retinae. One population has cell bodies in the inner nuclear layer (INL). Their dendrites are confined to a narrow stratum in the outer half of the inner plexiform layer (IPL). The other, displaced, population has cell bodies in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) with dendrites stratifying in the middle of the IPL. The density changes with eccentricity, ranging from 1,700 cells/mm2 centrally to 600 cells/mm2 in the periphery. Presumptive cholinergic cells were filled with the fluorescent dye Lucifer yellow. Both subpopulations have the same "starburstlike" morphology as described for rabbit cholinergic amacrine cells (Famiglietti, '83; Tauchi and Masland, '84; Masland et al., '84b). Their dendritic tree sizes change with eccentricity and range from 160 to 300 microns in diameter. Counterstaining of Lucifer yellow-filled cells by ChAT immunohistochemistry did not yield an unequivocal double staining. Nevertheless, indirect evidence of same soma size, same number and form of primary dendrites, same level of stratification, and the good fit into the cholinergic mosaic makes it very likely that the "starburstlike" amacrine cells in the rat use acetylcholine as their transmitter. A comparison with the rabbit cholinergic system strengthens this assumption and reveals a striking similarity between both species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902480103

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voigt, T.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Voigt, Thomas
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-06
Volume
248
Issue
1
Pages
19-35
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2075934939
Cited by
284
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
cholinergic amacrine cells, choline acetyltransferase, rat retina, inner nuclear layer, inner plexiform layer, ganglion cell layer, starburst amacrine cells, dendritic morphology, eccentricity
MeSH terms
Animals, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Cholinergic Fibers, Dendrites, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Isoquinolines, Nerve Degeneration, Neurons, Optic Nerve, Retina, Staining and Labeling, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review