The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Segment‐related, mosaic neurogenetic pattern in the forebrain and mesencephalon of early chick embryos: I. Topography of ache‐positive neuroblasts up to stage HH18
Abstract
Histochemical mapping of AChE‐positive neuroblasts in sectioned and whole‐mounted preparations of the chick embryo mesencephalon and prosencephalon allows a correlation of early neural tube morphogenesis (segmentation, longitudinal compartmentation) with the heterochronic pattern of neurogenesis. One significant finding is that the initial appearance of neuroblasts in the forebrain does not follow neuromeric segmentation, but evolves in parallel with it. Early neuroblasts appear as separate, distinct groups within specific matrix territories at the center of the transverse neuromeric segments. Neighbouring segments display different spatiotemporal patterns of neurogenesis. Overall gradients of differentiation in the rostrocaudal and ventrodorsal directions are absent, whereas a clear‐cut segment‐related, mosaic pattern becomes evident. Notwithstanding this, gross regularities of heterochrony in the neurogenetic behavior of the different segments lead to a definition of elemental longitudinal compartments of the forebrain and mesencephalon (floor, paramedian, basal, and alar regions) on the basis of precocious differentiation of the basal region and retarded differentiation of the paramedian and alar regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS
Walther, C., & Gruss, P. (1991) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.113.4.1435 · Cited by 1,255
Molecular and cellular biology of cholinesterases
Massoulié, J., Pezzementi, L., Bon, S., Krejci, E., & Vallette, F.-M. (1993) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(93)90040-y · Cited by 1,214
Forebrain gene expression domains and the evolving prosomeric model
Puelles, L., & Rubenstein, J. L. R. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(03)00234-0 · Cited by 734
Self-citationLongitudinal organization of the anterior neural plate and neural tube
Shimamura, K., Hartigan, D. J., Martinez, S., Puelles, L., & Rubenstein, J. L. R. (1995) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.121.12.3923 · Cited by 658
Self-citationEricson, J., Muhr, J., Placzek, M., Lints, T., Jessel, T. M., & Edlund, T. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90536-7 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Puelles, L., Amat, J. A., & Martinez‐de‐la‐Torre, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-12-08
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-268
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2060708053
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Segment‐related, mosaic neurogenetic pattern in the forebrain and mesencephalon of early chick embryos: I. Topography of ache‐positive neuroblasts up to stage HH18. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902660210
- The paper
- Puelles, L., Amat, J. A., & Martinez‐de‐la‐Torre, M. (1987). Segment‐related, mosaic neurogenetic pattern in the forebrain and mesencephalon of early chick embryos: I. Topography of ache‐positive neuroblasts up to stage HH18. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902660210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.