Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three‐dimensional counting: An accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material

Williams, Robert W., Rakic, Pasko·1988·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

We introduce a way to count and measure cells in an optically defined volume of tissue called a counting box. This method—direct three‐dimensional counting (3DC)—eliminates the need for correction factors, such as that introduced by Abercrombie (Anat. Rec. 94:239–247, '46), to determine the number of cells per unit volume (N v). Problems caused by irregular cell shape and cell size, nonrandom orientation, and splitting of cells by the knife during sectioning are overcome. Furthermore, 3DC is insensitive to large variations in section thickness. The innovative feature of 3DC is the definition of a counting box with top and bottom sides located inside the section a precise distance away from the cut surfaces of the tissue. The positions of the top and bottom sides of the counting box are delimited by using a digital length gauge and a Z‐axis control unit. Sections of tissue between 8 and 100 μ thick are examined with a high numerical aperture objective in combination with video‐enhanced differential interference contrast optics (DIC). Cells are marked on a television screen while the microscopist scans systematically from the top to the bottom of the counting box. Cells that are located completely inside the box and cells that only cross through its top, right, or back sides are counted. All cells that cross the planes that define the bottom, left, and front sides of the counting box are not counted. Direct 3DC provides an accurate, simple, and reliable way to count cells, nuclei, nucleoli, or other objects in sectioned material. To build the counting system requires a standard transmitted light microscope equipped with DIC optics, a video camera, a position sensor, and a Z‐axis control unit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902780305

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Williams, R. W., & Rakic, P.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-12-15
Volume
278
Issue
3
Pages
344-352
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1969014948
Cited by
431
References
36
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐dimensional counting: An accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902780305
The paper
Williams, R. W., & Rakic, P. (1988). Three‐dimensional counting: An accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902780305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.