The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three‐dimensional counting: An accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material
Abstract
We introduce a way to count and measure cells in an optically defined volume of tissue called a counting box. This method—direct three‐dimensional counting (3DC)—eliminates the need for correction factors, such as that introduced by Abercrombie (Anat. Rec. 94:239–247, '46), to determine the number of cells per unit volume (N v). Problems caused by irregular cell shape and cell size, nonrandom orientation, and splitting of cells by the knife during sectioning are overcome. Furthermore, 3DC is insensitive to large variations in section thickness. The innovative feature of 3DC is the definition of a counting box with top and bottom sides located inside the section a precise distance away from the cut surfaces of the tissue. The positions of the top and bottom sides of the counting box are delimited by using a digital length gauge and a Z‐axis control unit. Sections of tissue between 8 and 100 μ thick are examined with a high numerical aperture objective in combination with video‐enhanced differential interference contrast optics (DIC). Cells are marked on a television screen while the microscopist scans systematically from the top to the bottom of the counting box. Cells that are located completely inside the box and cells that only cross through its top, right, or back sides are counted. All cells that cross the planes that define the bottom, left, and front sides of the counting box are not counted. Direct 3DC provides an accurate, simple, and reliable way to count cells, nuclei, nucleoli, or other objects in sectioned material. To build the counting system requires a standard transmitted light microscope equipped with DIC optics, a video camera, a position sensor, and a Z‐axis control unit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections
Abercrombie, M. (1946) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1090940210 · Cited by 4,363
The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction*
Gundersen, H. J. G., & Jensen, E. B. (1987) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02837.x · Cited by 3,520
The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector
Sterio, D. C. (1984) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1984.tb02501.x · Cited by 2,519
Gundersen, H. J. G. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 1,658
Gundersen, H. J. G. (1986) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1986.tb02764.x · Cited by 1,429
Regressive Events in Neurogenesis
Cowan, W. M., Fawcett, J. W., O'Leary, D. D. M., & Stanfield, B. B. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6474175 · Cited by 1,316
Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect
Gundersen, H. J. G. (1977) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1977.tb00062.x · Cited by 1,275
The Neurosciences: Second Study Program
Szumski, A. J. (1971) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/51.12.1354 · Cited by 853
Methods for the Counting of Neurons
Konigsmark, B. W. (1970) · Contemporary Research Methods in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85986-1_14 · Cited by 763
Williams, R. W., & Herrup, K. (1988) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.11.030188.002231 · Cited by 585
Self-citation
Cited by
West, M. J., Slomianka, L., & Gundersen, H. J. G. (1991) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1092310411 · Cited by 2,994
Reconstruction and Simulation of Neocortical Microcircuitry
Markram, H., Muller, E., Ramaswamy, S., Reimann, M. W., Abdellah, M., Sanchez, C. A., Ailamaki, A., Alonso-Nanclares, L., Antille, N., Arsever, S., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.029 · Cited by 1,557
Rajkowska, G., Miguel-Hidalgo, J. J., Wei, J., Dilley, G., Pittman, S. D., Meltzer, H. Y., Overholser, J. C., Roth, B. L., & Stockmeier, C. A. (1999) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00041-4 · Cited by 1,477
Life and Death of Neurons in the Aging Brain
Morrison, J. H., & Hof, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5337.412 · Cited by 1,344
Unbiased stereological estimation of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus
West, M. J., & Gundersen, H. J. G. (1990) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902960102 · Cited by 1,153
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, R. W., & Rakic, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-12-15
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 344-352
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1969014948
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐dimensional counting: An accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902780305
- The paper
- Williams, R. W., & Rakic, P. (1988). Three‐dimensional counting: An accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902780305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.