The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efferent connections of the centromedian and parafascicular thalamic nuclei in the squirrel monkey: A light and electron microscopic study of the thalamostriatal projection in relation to striatal heterogeneity
Abstract
The organization of the thalamostriatal projections arising from the centromedian (CM) and parafascicular (Pf) thalamic nuclei in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) was studied at both light and electron microscopic levels. Following selective injections of the anterograde axonal tracer Phaseolus vulgaris‐leucoagglutinin (PHA‐L) into the CM or Pf, patterns of terminal arborization within the striatum were compared to the biochemical heterogeneity of the striatum as revealed by immunohistochemical staining for the calcium‐binding protein calbindin D‐28k (CaBP), and histochemical staining for the enzymes acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate‐diaphorase (NADPH‐diaphorase). The PHA‐L‐labeled axon terminals within the striatum were further analyzed at the ultrastructural level to characterize their pattern of synaptic organization. Dense and heterogeneous terminal fields occur in the „sensorimotor”︁ territory of the striatum after CM injections, or in the „associative”︁ striatal territory following Pf injections. In the associative territory labeled axons arborize in a diffuse manner predominantly within areas enriched with CaBP, AChE, or NADPH‐diaphorase, representing the matrix compartment, and tend to avoid areas poor in these substances, corresponding to the patch/striosome compartment. In the sensorimotor territory labeled axons form bands that occupy a subregion of the NADPH‐diaphorase‐rich zone in the putamen. The terminal pattern of the CM‐striatal projection suggests the existence of a more complex mosaic organization within the sensorimotor territory. Ultrastructural analysis of PHA‐L‐labeled elements within the striatum reveals that both CM and Pf projections form asymmetric synapses upon dendrites and spines of striatal cells. A total of 339 PHA‐L‐labeled boutons were examined after CM injections and compared to 293 boutons following Pf injections. After CM injections, 29% of PHA‐L‐labeled terminals form synapses on dendritic spines and 66% on dendritic shafts, whereas after Pf injections only 12% of synapses occur on dendritic spines compared to 81% on dendritic shafts. Labeled terminals forming axosomatic or axoaxonic synapses were not seen within the striatum following either CM or Pf injections. It is concluded that in the squirrel monkey: (1) Pf‐striatal fibers profusely arborize within the matrix compartment of the associative territory, (2) CM‐striatal fibers form bands that occupy a subregion of the NADPH‐diaphorase‐rich zone within the sensorimotor territory, and (3) that both Pf‐ and CM‐striatal projections establish asymmetric synapses with dendrites and spines of medium‐sized spiny cells. These results suggest that the complementary CM and Pf projections to the striatum are in a crucial position to exert a powerful and highly ordered excitatory influence upon the output neurons of the striatum in primates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in the basal ganglia
Graybiel, A. M. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90104-i · Cited by 1,576
Cited by
Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop
Parent, A., & Hazrati, L.-N. (1995) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(94)00007-c · Cited by 2,161
Self-citationVan der Werf, Y. D., Witter, M. P., & Groenewegen, H. J. (2002) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(02)00181-9 · Cited by 994
Haber, S. N. (2016) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2016.18.1/shaber · Cited by 922
Physiology and pharmacology of striatal neurons
Kreitzer, A. C. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135422 · Cited by 530
Central Thalamic Contributions to Arousal Regulation and Neurological Disorders of Consciousness
Schiff, N. D. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1417.029 · Cited by 463
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadikot, A. F., Parent, A., Smith, Y., & Bolam, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-06-08
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-242
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2006475955
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efferent connections of the centromedian and parafascicular thalamic nuclei in the squirrel monkey: A light and electron microscopic study of the thalamostriatal projection in relation to striatal heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903200207
- The paper
- Sadikot, A. F., Parent, A., Smith, Y., & Bolam, J. P. (1992). Efferent connections of the centromedian and parafascicular thalamic nuclei in the squirrel monkey: A light and electron microscopic study of the thalamostriatal projection in relation to striatal heterogeneity. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903200207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.