Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 160 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Afferent projections to the cholinergic pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and adjacent midbrain extrapyramidal area in the albino rat. I. Retrograde tracing studies

Steininger, Teresa L., Rye, David B., Wainer, Bruce H.·1992·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The afferent connections of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPT) and the adjacent midbrain extrapyramidal area (MEA) were examined by retrograde tracing with wheat germ agglutinin‐conjugated horseradish peroxidase (WGA‐HRP). Major afferents to the PPT originate in the periaqueductal gray, central tegmental field, lateral hypothalamic area, dorsal raphe nucleus, superior colliculus, and pontine and medullary reticular fields. Other putative inputs originate in the paraventricular and preoptic hypothalamic nuclei, the zona incerta, nucleus of the solitary tract, central superior raphe nucleus, substantia innominata, posterior hypothalamic area, and thalamic parafascicular nucleus. The major afferent to the medially adjacent MEA originates in the lateral habenula, while other putative afferents include the perifornical and lateral hypothalamic area, periaqueductal gray, superior colliculus, pontine reticular formation, and dorsal raphe nucleus. MEA inputs from basal ganglia nuclei include moderate projections from the substantia nigra pars reticulata, entopeduncular nucleus, and a small projection from the globus pallidus, but not the subthalamic nucleus. Dense anterograde labeling was observed in the substantia nigra pars compacta, entopeduncular nucleus, subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus, and caudate‐putamen only following WGA‐HRP injections involving the MEA. The results of this study demonstrate that the PPT and MEA share many potential afferents. Remarkable differences were found that support distinguishing between these two nuclei in future studies regarding the functional organization of the midbrain and pons. The results, for example, confirm our previous observations that the largely reciprocal connections between the midbrain and basal ganglia distinguish the MEA from the PPT. Afferents from the lateral habenula and contralateral superior colliculus represent extensions of more traditional basal ganglion circuitry which further delineate the MEA from the PPT. The results are discussed with respect to the important role of the midbrain and pons in behavioral state control and locomotor mechanisms. © 1992 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903210403

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 160 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Steininger, T. L., Rye, D. B., & Wainer, B. H.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-07-22
Volume
321
Issue
4
Pages
515-543
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1963895945
Cited by
273
References
160
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Afferent projections to the cholinergic pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and adjacent midbrain extrapyramidal area in the albino rat. I. Retrograde tracing studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903210403
The paper
Steininger, T. L., Rye, D. B., & Wainer, B. H. (1992). Afferent projections to the cholinergic pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and adjacent midbrain extrapyramidal area in the albino rat. I. Retrograde tracing studies. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903210403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.