Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preservation of topography in the connections between the subiculum, field CA1, and the entorhinal cortex in rats

Tamamaki, Nobuaki, Nojyo, Yoshiaki·1995·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

In order to examine whether the entorhinal‐hippocampal‐entorhinal circuit is reciprocal and topographic, the connections between the subiculum, the CA1 field, and the entorhinal cortex were studied with the carbocyanine dye (Dil), which moves in both retrograde and anterograde directions. We investigated the organization of reciprocal connections revealed by injections of Dil in the entorhinal cortex along the rhinal sulcus. Anterograde fluorescent labeling showed the same pattern reported in previous studies of the dorsal hippocampus. When the injection site of DiI extended into the deep layers (IV–VI) of the same cortical column, the anterograde labeling of the perforant path was accompanied by retrograde labeling of the subicular neurons and the CA1 neurons. The distribution of labeled cells overlapped the distribution of labeled fibers, and the distribution of labeled cells paralleled that of the labeled fibers in the CA1 field. DiI injection into the medial entorhinal cortex revealed fewer retrogradely labeled subicular neurons than injection into the lateral entorhinal cortex, whereas the number of labeled CA1 neurons was not dependent on the injection site. The number of labeled CA1 neurons was always several times greater than the number of subicular neurons. Thus, the amount of information conveyed by the CA1 projection might be higher than that conveyed by the subicular projection. These results indicate that the entorhinal cortex, CA1, and the subiculum are connected reciprocally and topographically. We believe that the framework of the major hippocampal circuit proposed in previous studies should be reconsidered. We propose that the CA1 projection, rather than the subicular projection, is the main projection that feeds back information from the hippocampus to the entorhinal cortex. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903530306

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Tamamaki, N., & Nojyo, Y.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-03-13
Volume
353
Issue
3
Pages
379-390
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2069067113
Cited by
224
References
4
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preservation of topography in the connections between the subiculum, field CA1, and the entorhinal cortex in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903530306
The paper
Tamamaki, N., & Nojyo, Y. (1995). Preservation of topography in the connections between the subiculum, field CA1, and the entorhinal cortex in rats. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903530306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.