The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part III: Colour preference modeling
Abstract
In this study three colour preference models for single colours were developed. The first model was developed on the basis of the colour emotions, clean–dirty, tense–relaxed, and heavy–light. In this model colour preference was found affected most by the emotional feeling “clean.” The second model was developed on the basis of the three colour‐emotion factors identified in Part I, colour activity, colour weight, and colour heat. By combining this model with the colour‐science‐based formulae of these three factors, which have been developed in Part I, one can predict colour preference of a test colour from its colour‐appearance attributes. The third colour preference model was directly developed from colour‐appearance attributes. In this model colour preference is determined by the colour difference between a test colour and the reference colour (L*, a*, b*) = (50, −8, 30). The above approaches to modeling single‐colour preference were also adopted in modeling colour preference for colour combinations. The results show that it was difficult to predict colour‐combination preference by colour emotions only. This study also clarifies the relationship between colour preference and colour harmony. The results show that although colour preference is strongly correlated with colour harmony, there are still colours of which the two scales disagree with each other. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 29, 381–389, 2004; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/col.20047
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guilford, J. P., & Smith, P. C. (1959) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419491 · Cited by 264
Cited by
An ecological valence theory of human color preference
Palmer, S. E., & Schloss, K. B. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906172107 · Cited by 744
Color and emotion: effects of hue, saturation, and brightness
Wilms, L., & Oberfeld, D. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0880-8 · Cited by 401
Optimisation of food expectations using product colour and appearance
Wei, S.-T., Ou, L.-C., Luo, M. R., & Hutchings, J. B. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.07.004 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Ou, L., Luo, M. R., Woodcock, A., & Wright, A.
- Venue
- Color Research & Application
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-26
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 381-389
- ISSN
- 0361-2317 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6378
- OpenAlex
- W1989665241
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part III: Colour preference modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/col.20047
- The paper
- Ou, L., Luo, M. R., Woodcock, A., & Wright, A. (2004). A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part III: Colour preference modeling. Color Research & Application. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.