Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 565

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

QIIME 2 Enables Comprehensive End‐to‐End Analysis of Diverse Microbiome Data and Comparative Studies with Publicly Available Data

Open access
Estaki, Mehrbod, Jiang, Lingjing, Bokulich, Nicholas A., McDonald, Daniel, González, Antonio, Kosciolek, Tomasz, Martino, Cameron, Zhu, Qiyun, Birmingham, Amanda, Vázquez‐Baeza, Yoshiki, Dillon, Matthew R., Bolyen, Evan, Caporaso, J. Gregory, Knight, Rob·2020·Current Protocols in Bioinformatics

Abstract

QIIME 2 is a completely re‐engineered microbiome bioinformatics platform based on the popular QIIME platform, which it has replaced. QIIME 2 facilitates comprehensive and fully reproducible microbiome data science, improving accessibility to diverse users by adding multiple user interfaces. QIIME 2 can be combined with Qiita, an open‐source web‐based platform, to re‐use available data for meta‐analysis. The following basic protocol describes how to install QIIME 2 on a single computer and analyze microbiome sequence data, from processing of raw DNA sequence reads through generating publishable interactive figures. These interactive figures allow readers of a study to interact with data with the same ease as its authors, advancing microbiome science transparency and reproducibility. We also show how plug‐ins developed by the community to add analysis capabilities can be installed and used with QIIME 2, enhancing various aspects of microbiome analyses—e.g., improving taxonomic classification accuracy. Finally, we illustrate how users can perform meta‐analyses combining different datasets using readily available public data through Qiita. In this tutorial, we analyze a subset of the Early Childhood Antibiotics and the Microbiome (ECAM) study, which tracked the microbiome composition and development of 43 infants in the United States from birth to 2 years of age, identifying microbiome associations with antibiotic exposure, delivery mode, and diet. For more information about QIIME 2, see https://qiime2.org . To troubleshoot or ask questions about QIIME 2 and microbiome analysis, join the active community at https://forum.qiime2.org . © 2020 The Authors. Basic Protocol : Using QIIME 2 with microbiome data Support Protocol : Further microbiome analyses

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpbi.100

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 565

Metadata

Authors
Estaki, M., Jiang, L., Bokulich, N. A., McDonald, D., González, A., Kosciolek, T., Martino, C., Zhu, Q., Birmingham, A., Vázquez‐Baeza, Y., Dillon, M. R., Bolyen, E., Caporaso, J. G., & Knight, R.
Venue
Current Protocols in Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-28
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
e100-e100
ISSN
  • 1934-3396 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-340X
OpenAlex
W3019168548
Cited by
565
References
15
FWCI
13.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QIIME 2 Enables Comprehensive End‐to‐End Analysis of Diverse Microbiome Data and Comparative Studies with Publicly Available Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cpbi.100
The paper
Estaki, M., Jiang, L., Bokulich, N. A., McDonald, D., González, A., Kosciolek, T., Martino, C., Zhu, Q., Birmingham, A., Vázquez‐Baeza, Y., Dillon, M. R., Bolyen, E., Caporaso, J. G., & Knight, R. (2020). QIIME 2 Enables Comprehensive End‐to‐End Analysis of Diverse Microbiome Data and Comparative Studies with Publicly Available Data. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.