Cited by 18Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases

A randomized phase 1 evaluation of deupirfenidone, a novel deuterium-containing drug candidate for interstitial lung disease and other inflammatory and fibrotic diseases

Chen, Michael C., Korth, Christopher C., Harnett, Mark D., Elenko, Eric, Lickliter, Jason D.·2022·Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development

Abstract

LYT-100 (deupirfenidone) is a selectively deuterated form of pirfenidone under development for the treatment of inflammatory and fibrotic diseases, including interstitial lung disease. Adverse events associated with antifibrotics can be a barrier to adoption and persistence in patients with interstitial lung diseases, most of whom are not on standard-of-care therapy. LYT-100 is designed to have a differentiated pharmacokinetic (PK) profile from pirfenidone and could offer a differentiated safety profile compared to current standard-of-care drugs while retaining the biochemical potency and specificity of pirfenidone. We conducted a phase 1b study to ascertain the safety, tolerability, steady-state PK profile, and food effect of LYT-100. This was a 2-part study. Part 1 assessed multiple ascending doses of LYT-100 from 100, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg twice daily given over 5 days without titration. Part 2 assessed the effects of fed vs fasting conditions on the PK profile of a single 500-mg dose of LYT-100. All doses up to 1000 mg were well tolerated, with adverse events being mild and transient. Exposure was slightly lower in the fed condition. LYT-100 was well tolerated and has a dose-proportional PK profile. The ratio of parent to major metabolite concentration was higher than reported with pirfenidone, which is consistent with an effect of deuteration on metabolism. No maximum tolerated dose was identified up to 1000 mg twice-daily dosing. These results support further clinical development of LYT-100, particularly considering the adverse event profile of current standard-of-care drugs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpdd.1040

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, M. C., Korth, C. C., Harnett, M. D., Elenko, E., & Lickliter, J. D.
Affiliations
  • PureTech Health Boston Massachusetts USA
  • PureTech (United States) (US)
  • Nucleus Network Melbourne Australia
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-15
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
220-234
ISSN
  • 2160-763X (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-7648
OpenAlex
W3212147235
Cited by
18
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Keywords
interstitial lung disease, antifibrotic agents, fibrotic diseases, pharmacokinetics, food effect, safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, dose proportionality, drug metabolism, adverse events
MeSH terms
Deuterium, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Pyridones, Lung Diseases, Interstitial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review