Cited by 101Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Adoption of the antifibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Dempsey, Timothy M., Payne, Stephanie, Sangaralingham, Lindsey, Yao, Xiaoxi, Shah, Nilay D., Limper, Andrew H.·2021·Annals of the American Thoracic Society

Abstract

Abstract Rationale In October 2014, the antifibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib became the first medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Since approval, there has been no nonregistry analysis of the real-world adoption of these medications in everyday clinical practice. Objectives To evaluate the adoption, persistence, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs of pirfenidone and nintedanib since their approval in the United States in 2014. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was performed by identifying privately insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with IPF. We then split the patients into three cohorts: those who were untreated and those who filled a prescription for either pirfenidone or nintedanib between October 1, 2014, and July 31, 2019. The primary outcome was adoption of the medications. Secondary outcomes included medication persistence and prescription drug costs. Results A total of 10,996 patients with IPF were identified in the data set. A minority of patients (26.4%) with IPF identified in the cohort had started either medication since approval in 2014, with the adoption of both medications being comparable at around 13.2%. Those receiving the medications were younger (72 vs. 73.9 yr; P < 0.0001) and healthier (3.9 vs. 4.9 comorbidities; P < 0.0001) than those not receiving treatment. Men were significantly more likely to receive treatment than woman (30.0% vs. 21.9%; P < 0.0001). Among treated patients, 42.8% discontinued the medications during the study period. Patients’ OOP expenses per month were high for both drugs (mean, $397.51 for nintedanib; mean, $394.49 for pirfenidone). Conclusions The adoption of both the antifibrotic medications in the United States in everyday practice has been low since approval and may be associated with the high OOP cost.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1513/annalsats.202007-901oc

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dempsey, T. M., Payne, S., Sangaralingham, L., Yao, X., Shah, N. D., & Limper, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
  • Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Dempsey, Timothy M.
Venue
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
1121-1128
ISSN
  • 2325-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-6933
OpenAlex
W3122584685
Cited by
101
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pirfenidone, nintedanib, antifibrotic agents, treatment persistence, out-of-pocket costs, prescription drug costs, Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, real-world applications, drug approval
MeSH terms
Aged, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Female, Medicare, Humans, Indoles, Male, Pyridones, Retrospective Studies, United States, Treatment Outcome, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review