The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internet of things in smart education environment: Supportive framework in the decision‐making process
Abstract
Summary: The role of education, which propagates knowledge, becomes increasingly significant in the past little years due to the fulminatory expansion in knowledge. Meantime, the model of education process is going via a conversion in which the learning of different students need to be completed in various ways. Therefore, the smart education environment is encouraged. It incorporates different information and communication technologies to activate learning process and adjust to the requirements of different students. The quality of learning process for students can be enhanced through continually monitoring and analyzing the state and activities of different students via information sensing devices and information processing platforms for offering feedback about learning process of different students. The Internet of Things pledges to achieve a great variation in life, goodness of individual's life, and organizations' productivity. Via a vastly dispensed locally smart network of intelligent objects, the IoT has the chance to allow expansions and improvements to essential utilities in various fields, while introducing a novel ecosystem for developing application. Applying the concept of Internet of Things in any education environment will increase the quality of education process because students will learn rapidly, and teachers will fulfill their job efficiently. This paper is designed to illustrate the basic concepts, definitions, characteristics, technology, and challenges of Internet of Things. We also illustrated the role of Internet of Things in building a smart educational process, and also, in making efficient and effective decisions, which is vital in our daily life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
Cited by
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00231-3 · Cited by 370
IoT enabled environmental toxicology for air pollution monitoring using AI techniques
Asha, P., Natrayan, L., Geetha, B. T., Beulah, J. R., Sumathy, R., Varalakshmi, G., & Neelakandan, S. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112574 · Cited by 303
Iliuţă, M.-E., Moisescu, M.-A., Pop, E., Ionita, A.-D., Caramihai, S.-I., & Mitulescu, T.-C. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14135454 · Cited by 134
Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01719 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdel‐Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Mohamed, M., & Rushdy, E.
- Venue
- Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1532-0626 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-0634
- OpenAlex
- W2800583139
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Internet of things in smart education environment: Supportive framework in the decision‐making process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cpe.4515
- The paper
- Abdel‐Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Mohamed, M., & Rushdy, E. (2019). Internet of things in smart education environment: Supportive framework in the decision‐making process. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.