Cited by 21Organic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research

A Very Low Band Gap Diketopyrrolopyrrole–Porphyrin Conjugated Polymer

Bucher, Léo, Tanguy, Loïc, Fortin, Daniel, Desbois, Nicolas, Harvey, Pierre D., Sharma, Ganesh D., Gros, Claude P.·2017·ChemPlusChem

Abstract

A porphyrin-diketopyrrolopyrrole-containing polymer (poly(porphyrin-diketopyrrolopyrrole) (PPDPP)) shows impressive molar absorption coefficients from λ=300 to 1000 nm. The photophysical and structural properties of PPDPP have been studied. With PPDPP as the electron donor and [6,6]-phenyl C 71 butyric acid methyl ester (PC 71 BM) as the electron acceptor, the bulk heterojunction polymer solar cell showed overall power conversion efficiencies of 4.18 and 6.44 % for as-cast and two-step annealing processed PPDPP:PC 71 BM (1:2) active layers, respectively. These results are quite impressive for porphyrin-containing polymers, especially when directly included in the π-conjugated backbone, and offer interesting perspectives for the design of new materials based on this chromophore.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cplu.201700035

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining porphyrin and DPP units to construct a donor polymer is a promising idea, and it has been successfully used to construct efficient donor small molecule materials.

    “Thus, it is a promising idea to combine these units to construct the donor polymer, and it has been successfully used to construct e ffi cient donor small molecule (SM) materials. 49”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bucher, L., Tanguy, L., Fortin, D., Desbois, N., Harvey, P. D., Sharma, G. D., & Gros, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • LNM Institute of Information Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Harvey, Pierre D.
  • Sharma, Ganesh D.
  • Gros, Claude P.
Venue
ChemPlusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-17
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
625-630
ISSN
2192-6506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592833921
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ChemPlusChem (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Keywords
diketopyrrolopyrrole, porphyrins, conjugated polymers, low band gap, polymer solar cells, bulk heterojunction, PC71BM, electron donors, two-step annealing, photophysical properties, molar absorptivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review