Cited by 89Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Client and therapist attachment styles and working alliance

Bucci, Sandra, Seymour‐Hyde, Annily, Harris, Alison, Berry, Katherine·2016·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Working alliance has been shown to be important in influencing the outcome of therapy. Research evidence suggests that characteristics of both clients and therapists impact on the development of the working alliance. Although attachment theory is well researched, there is relatively limited research on the relationship between both therapist and client attachment style and the working alliance; traditionally, research has placed greater emphasis on client characteristics. The current study examines the extent to which both client and therapist self-reported attachment styles are related to the working alliance. Thirty clients and 42 therapists were recruited from primary care psychology services. Thirty client-therapist dyads were examined. Participants completed self-report measures of anxiety and depression, attachment style and working alliance at a single time point. Client and therapist attachment security were not independently related to working alliance. However, there was a significant association between therapist insecure attachment and alliance in more symptomatic clients. There was also some evidence that therapists and clients with oppositional attachment styles reported more favourable alliances. The study suggests that the relationship between therapist attachment style and alliance is not straightforward. It is likely that the complexity of clients' presenting problems, coupled with interaction between client-therapist attachment styles, influences the therapeutic alliance. KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE: Therapist insecure attachment may negatively affect the therapeutic alliance in more symptomatic clients. It is important to consider the interaction between client and therapist attachment and how these interactions influence the therapeutic alliance. Therapists should be aware of their own personal attachment style and reflect on how this might manifest during the therapeutic process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.1944

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bucci, S., Seymour‐Hyde, A., Harris, A., & Berry, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Walton Centre (GB)
  • Salford Primary Care Psychology Service Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust Salford M7 2EY
Corresponding author
Bucci, Sandra
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-02
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
155-165
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W1549054755
Cited by
89
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, attachment styles, therapist attachment, insecure attachment, attachment security, primary care psychology, symptom severity, anxiety, depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review