Cited by 23Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health services

Personal recovery in personality disorder: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative methods studies.

Shepherd, Andrew, Sanders, Caroline, Doyle, Michael, Shaw, Jenny·2016·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Support of personal recovery represents the aim for many modern mental health services. There is a lack of conceptual clarity around the application of the term however and this is particularly problematic with regard to the personality disorder diagnoses. This study sought to review the existing qualitative methods literature in relation to the experience of personal recovery in personality disorder. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted. Identified studies were incorporated through meta-synthesis in order to develop higher order descriptive themes representative of the individual experience described within included studies. RESULTS: Three studies were identified and incorporated into the meta-synthesis. Three novel higher order themes were developed: Safety and containment as a prerequisite to recovery, social networks and autonomy in the recovery process and identity construction as a process of change. CONCLUSION: Personal recovery in personality disorder is revealed as a complex process reflecting both personal and social experiences or desires. These findings have important implications for clinical practice - emphasising the need to work closely with individuals and to develop an understanding of both their social experience and networks. Further research, taking greater account of social context in the recovery process, is necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020764015589133

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shepherd, A., Sanders, C., Doyle, M., & Shaw, J.
Affiliations
  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Shepherd, Andrew
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2015-06-16
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
41-50
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W2153692867
Cited by
23
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (DRF-2013-06-122)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
personal recovery, personality disorders, lived experience, social networks, autonomy, identity construction, mental health services
MeSH terms
Adult, Deinstitutionalization, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review