CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individualized versus standardized therapy: A comparative evaluation with obsessive‐compulsive patients

Emmelkamp, Paul M. G., Bouman, Theo K., Blaauw, Eric·1994·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
DOI 10.1002/cpp.5640010206
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether individualized tailor‐made behavioural treatment based upon a problem analysis of each case was more effective than a standardized behavioural treatment protocol. Twenty‐two obsessive‐compulsive patients were randomly assigned to two treatment conditions: (1) tailor‐made cognitive behavioural therapy and (2) standardized exposure in vivo therapy. Treatment in both conditions led to significant improvements on obsessive‐compulsive targets and on the Maudsley Obsessional‐Compulsive Inventory. Improvement generalized to general levels of psychopathology, depressed mood and social anxiety. Contrary to expectations the individualized treatment was not more effective than the standardized exposure therapy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.5640010206

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies comparing outcomes of patients randomly assigned to manualised treatments or tailored therapy based on CF have not found significant differences between them.

    “Studies comparing outcomes of patients randomly assigned to manualised treatments or tailored therapy based on CF have not found significant differences between them (Emmelkamp et al., 1994;Jacobson et al., 1989;Schulte et al., 1992).”

    From Data-Informed Case Formulation with the Trier Treatment Navigator (2022) · cites this paper as Emmelkamp et al., 1994

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Boelens W.(1990)Cognitive and behaviour therapy of depression. Dissertation University of Groningen The Netherlands.
  2. Derogatis L. R., 1973, SCL‐90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale, Psychopharmacological Bulletin, 9, 13
  3. 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790090032005 · DOI
  4. van Dam‐Baggen C. M. J., 1987, Inventory of Interpersonal Situations
  5. 10.1007/978-1-4684-7009-3 · DOI
  6. Emmelkamp P. M. G., 1982, Learning Theory Approaches to Psychiatry, 119
  7. Emmelkamp P. M. G., 1992, Perspectives and Promises of Clinical Psychology
  8. 10.1016/0005-7967(91)90120-R · DOI · Paper page
  9. Emmelkamp P. M. G., 1992, Anxiety Disorders: A Practitioner's Guide
  10. Emmelkamp P. M. G., 1980, Treatment of harming obsessions, Behaviour Analysis and Modifications, 4, 28
  11. 10.1016/0005-7967(89)90124-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0005-7894(88)80022-4 · DOI
  13. Marks I. M., 1987, Fears, Phobias and Rituals
  14. 10.1016/0005-7967(89)90013-2 · DOI
  15. Meyer V., 1979, Behavioral analysis of clinical cases, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 169
  16. 10.1016/0005-7916(89)90059-1 · DOI
  17. Rachman S., 1980, Obsessions and Compulsions
  18. 10.1016/0146-6402(92)90001-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/001316447703700232 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/978-1-4613-0523-1_15 · DOI
  21. Visser S., 1992, Perspectives and Promises of Clinical Psychology
  22. 10.1016/0005-7916(77)90095-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0005-7916(86)90018-2 · DOI
  24. Yates A. J., 1970, Behavior Therapy
  25. 10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Bouman, T. K., & Blaauw, E.
Corresponding author
Emmelkamp, Paul M. G.
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-04
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
95-100
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
DOI
10.1002/cpp.5640010206
OpenAlex
W2109511608
Cited by
77
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 5558 d)
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, personalized treatment, standardized treatment, exposure and response prevention, treatment effectiveness, treatment generalization, depression, social anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review