Understanding and Predicting Variability in Response to Treatment in Psychotic Disorders: In Vivo Findings
Open accessAbstract
O.D.H. has received investigator-initiated research funding from and/or participated in advisory/speaker meetings organized by Astra-Zeneca, Autifony, BMS, Eli Lilly, Heptares, Janssen, Lundbeck, Lyden-Delta, Otsuka, Servier, Sunovion, Rand and Roche. Neither O.D.H. nor his family have been employed by or have holdings/a financial stake in any biomedical company. S.J. reports no conflict of interest.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Kapur, S., Zipursky, R., Jones, C., Remington, G., & Houle, S. (2000) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.514 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Howes, O. D., Kambeitz, J., Kim, E., Stahl, D., Slifstein, M., Abi-Dargham, A., & Kapur, S. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.169 · Cited by 967 · see citing works
Self-citationDeterminants of treatment response in first-episode psychosis: an 18F-DOPA PET study
Jauhar, S., Veronese, M., Nour, M. M., Rogdaki, M., Hathway, P., Turkheimer, F. E., Stone, J., Egerton, A., McGuire, P., Kapur, S., et al. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0042-4 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain-imaging studies of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review
Mouchlianitis, E. D., McCutcheon, R. A., & Howes, O. D. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00540-4 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationJauhar, S., Veronese, M., Nour, M. M., Rogdaki, M., Hathway, P., Natesan, S., Turkheimer, F., Stone, J., Egerton, A., McGuire, P., et al. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.07.003 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Method for Tapering Antipsychotic Treatment That May Minimize the Risk of Relapse
Horowitz, M. A., Jauhar, S., Natesan, S., Murray, R. M., & Taylor, D. (2021) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbab017 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Jauhar, S., & Howes, O. D.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Howes, Oliver D.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-18
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1079-1081
- ISSN
- 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6535
- OpenAlex
- W2921486418
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- kclpure.kcl.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (MC‐A656‐5QD30)
- Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
- Wellcome Trust (094849/Z/10/Z)
- King’s College London
- Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- treatment response variability, psychosis, schizophrenia, antipsychotic drugs, in vivo pharmacology, treatment response prediction, drug response variability
- MeSH terms
- Dopamine, Drug Resistance, Humans, Prognosis, Psychotic Disorders, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Neurotransmitter Agents, Biomarkers, Pharmacological, Medication Therapy Management, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review