Cited by 76Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The effects of antipsychotic treatment on presynaptic dopamine synthesis capacity in first-episode psychosis: a positron emission tomography study

Open access
Jauhar, Sameer, Veronese, Mattia, Nour, Matthew M., Rogdaki, Maria, Hathway, Pamela, Natesan, Sridhar, Turkheimer, Federico, Stone, James +4 more·2019·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Elevated striatal dopamine synthesis capacity has been implicated in the etiology and antipsychotic response in psychotic illness. The effects of antipsychotic medication on dopamine synthesis capacity are poorly understood, and no prospective studies have examined this question in a solely first-episode psychosis sample. Furthermore, it is unknown whether antipsychotic efficacy is linked to reductions in dopamine synthesis capacity. We conducted a prospective [ 18 F]-dihydroxyphenyl-L - alanine positron emission tomography study in antipsychotic naïve/free people with first-episode psychosis commencing antipsychotic treatment. Methods Dopamine synthesis capacity (indexed as influx rate constant) and clinical symptoms (measured using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) were measured before and after at least 5 weeks of antipsychotic treatment in people with first-episode psychosis. Data from a prior study indicated that a sample size of 13 would have >80% power to detect a statistically significant change in dopamine synthesis capacity at alpha = .05 (two tailed). Results A total of 20 people took part in the study, 17 of whom were concordant with antipsychotic medication at therapeutic doses. There was no significant effect of treatment on dopamine synthesis capacity in the whole striatum ( p = .47), thalamus, or midbrain, nor was there any significant relationship between change in dopamine synthesis capacity and change in positive (ρ = .35, p = .13), negative, or total psychotic symptoms. Conclusions Dopamine synthesis capacity is unaltered by antipsychotic treatment, and therapeutic effects are not mediated by changes in this aspect of dopaminergic function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.07.003

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jauhar, S., Veronese, M., Nour, M. M., Rogdaki, M., Hathway, P., Natesan, S., Turkheimer, F., Stone, J., Egerton, A., McGuire, P., Kapur, S., & Howes, O. D.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Howes, Oliver D.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
79-87
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2869595516
Cited by
75
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sunovion
  • Wellcome Trust (094849/Z/10/Z)
  • Maudsley Charity
  • GW Pharmaceuticals
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2016-17-005)
  • King's College London
  • Servier
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Medical Research Council (MC- A656-5QD30, MR/N026063/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
antipsychotic drugs, dopamine synthesis capacity, first-episode psychosis, striatum, antipsychotic efficacy, positive and negative symptoms, thalamus, midbrain, dopaminergic activity
MeSH terms
Adult, Corpus Striatum, Dihydroxyphenylalanine, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychotic Disorders, Antipsychotic Agents, Neostriatum, Positron-Emission Tomography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review