Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous theophylline

Mitenko, Paul A., Ogilvie, Richard I.·1973·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Plasma theophylline concentrations were measured after single intravenous infusions of aminophylline to asthmatic patients and normal volunteers. Using two‐compartment kinetic analysis, no basic differences in drug disposition were found. For the 16 subiects studied the overall mean plasma clearance rate was 0.0719 I per kilogram per hour, and overall mean beta or slow disposition constant was 0.159 hr−1, corresponding to a plasma half‐time of 4.36 hr. This information should be useful in determining precise dosage requirements for theophylline in clinical situations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpt1973144part1509

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Mitenko, P. A., & Ogilvie, R. I.
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1973-07
Volume
14
Issue
4part1
Pages
509-513
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2398325927
Cited by
178
References
0
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacokinetics of intravenous theophylline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cpt1973144part1509
The paper
Mitenko, P. A., & Ogilvie, R. I. (1973). Pharmacokinetics of intravenous theophylline. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt1973144part1509

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.