The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Investigation of Large German Companies
Open accessAbstract
Companies which manage global supply chains face a high level of complexity with a large number of suppliers in diverse socio‐economic contexts and growing expectations of customers and standardization schemes to control social and environmental aspects. In the context of sustainable development, the effective management of supplier relationships has therefore attracted particular attention in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). This paper investigates two SSCM strategic approaches in Germany's largest stock companies with regard to supplier management. Supplier evaluation and selection adopts a risk‐oriented strategic perspective whereas supplier development represents a business‐opportunity‐oriented approach to managing supplier chains for sustainable products. The survey‐based analysis reveals that large German stock companies mainly implement risk‐oriented SSCM strategies. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524
THE ROLE OF PURCHASING IN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION ANALYSIS
Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2004) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2004.tb00173.x · Cited by 762
Green purchasing practices of US firms
Min, H., & Galle, W. P. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005923 · Cited by 745
Purchasing's Role in Environmental Management: Cross‐Functional Development of Grounded Theory
Carter, C. R., & Dresner, M. (2001) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2001.tb00102.x · Cited by 384
Cited by
Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions
Carter, C. R., & Liane Easton, P. (2011) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600031111101420 · Cited by 1,545
A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management
Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.023 · Cited by 377
An overview on corporate response towards sustainability issues in textile industry
Desore, A., & Narula, S. A. (2018) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-017-9949-1 · Cited by 344
Feng, M., Yu, W., Wang, X., Wong, C. Y., Xu, M., & Xiao, Z. (2018) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2033 · Cited by 344
Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Joshi, S., & Kumar, A. (2022) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2020.1810213 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Harms, D., Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-24
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 205-218
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W1861168268
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 30.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Investigation of Large German Companies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/csr.1293
- The paper
- Harms, D., Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2013). Strategies in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Investigation of Large German Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
