The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing Corporate Sustainability and CSR: A Conceptual Framework Combining Values, Strategies and Instruments Contributing to Sustainable Development
Abstract
Sustainable development can be a source of success, innovation, and profitability for companies. To use this source and to deal with the challenge of sustainability, corporations need a framework they can rely on in order to identify opportunities and threats and to develop, implement, control, and improve corporate sustainability strategies to be both more sustainable (for themselves and the society) and more successful in economic terms. Based on an extensive literature review of strategic management, CSR, and corporate sustainability, a conceptual framework is developed which offers an integrated view on the relevance of sustainability aspects for an individual company and enables the integration of these sustainability aspects on different management levels. Contextual factors are used to identify the relevance of sustainable development and the significant sustainability aspects. Based on this initial step, the relevance of sustainability issues for the different management levels, as well as opportunities and threats related to sustainable development, can be identified. The framework distinguishes three different management levels: normative management, strategic management, and operational management. Questions of vision and mission of a company and of the fit between sustainability engagement and organizational culture are in focus of the normative management level. Developing an effective corporate sustainability strategy is part of the strategic level. The implementation of the sustainability strategy in the different corporate functions is part of the operational level. This framework for corporate sustainability management is supported by instruments which are clustered in different areas like performance measurement, assessment and evaluation, operational management or strategic management. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions
Dahlsrud, A. (2008) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.132 · Cited by 4,092 · cited 1×
“There is an increasing interest of society and of business it-self developing the business sector towards sustainability as corporations can play an important role in theendeavor of sustainable development (Bansal, 2005; Dahlsrud, 2008; Eweje, 2011).”
BackgroundBeyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability:
Salzmann, O., Ionescu-somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007 · Cited by 930
Cited by
Mio, C., Costantini, A., & Panfilo, S. (2022) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2206 · Cited by 300
Improving how sustainability reports drive change: A critical discourse analysis
Higgins, C., & Coffey, B. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.101 · Cited by 155
Laurett, R., Paço, A., & Mainardes, E. W. (2021) · Environmental Development · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100583 · Cited by 55
Cradle-to-Cradle in Project Management: A Case Study
Ismayilova, A., & Silvius, G. (2021) · International Journal of Circular Economy and Waste Management · doi:10.4018/ijcewm.20210101.oa1 · Cited by 18
Integrating Sustainability into Core Business
Cici, C., & D'Isanto, D. (2017) · Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management · doi:10.4468/2017.1.05cici.disanto · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumgartner, R. J.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 258-271
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W1947836447
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
